Cutting Through Hype, Hypocrisy In Vote Fraud Claims
Recent
events show why election theft deserves much more scrutiny than it
receives from either government officials or news reporters. Most
dramatically, a federal judge has released the 2008 testimony of GOP IT
guru Michael Connell, right. The Ohio resident died in a mysterious
plane crash that year after anonymous warnings he would be killed if he
testified about his work with Karl Rove and others helping the
Bush-Cheney ticket win in 2000 and 2004.Other recent news includes claims by both major parties of irregularities in last week’s Wisconsin state senate recall elections. In a pattern familiar nationally, Democrats suspect vote hiding by a partisan GOP elections supervisor and Republicans allege illegal inducements by Democrats to encourage voting. Elsewhere, Fox News played up a report about how a county judge in Nevada called the community-organizing group ACORN “reprehensible” on Aug. 10 and ordered a $5,000 fine for the defunct group because it paid a bonus to workers who registered voters.
To cut through the confusion on such disputes, the non-partisan Justice Integrity Project provides below a research guide to important recent allegations and landmark research. It emphasizes books and research reports by critics since they face the burden of challenging conventional wisdom and are typically ignored.
But our guide includes also commentaries by Fox News (whose analyst Rove is at left) and author John Fund. They
have
been leaders in fostering public fears that election fraud largely
involves ineligible, poor and largely Democratic voters who may distort
results. In general, the evidence shows that electronic voting fraud, voter suppression and similar dirty tricks by public officials pose a serious threat to the democratic process. But this research is difficult because officials control the information. Also, research into official wrongdoing tends to be sporadic, under-funded and so controversial as to be career-threatening for researchers. Major news organizations are reluctant to report even allegations of official fraud and other wrongdoing, especially in the most important elections. So, reporters and other researchers need courage and skill, as well as management support.
Statistics professor Steven Freeman, right, and In These Times editor Joel Bleifuss devote an entire chapter to journalistic cover-up in their book, Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen? The book argues that exit polls and other clues prove massive election fraud flipping the election -- and that leading news organizations not only downplayed the evidence but suppressed much of it outright or misreported results.The paperback edition of New York University professor Mark Crispin Miller's book, Fooled Again, contains a 100-page Afterword summarizing how the mainstream media avoids the issue.
One prominent national reporter assigned to such matters privately explained to me recently the thinking of his editors: They want rock-solid proof of conspiracy before even mentioning claims of misconduct for fear of ruining public confidence in the campaign and elections process. Yet by that standard, readers would learn little about any public issue. The Washington Post’s 1970s Watergate investigation, for example, was a series of reports that incrementally moved the story forward. Similarly, our Project’s exposé of the Justice Department frame-up of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman had its roots in brief news reports in Alabama newspapers a decade ago that helped show the ethics lapses of the jurist who later became Siegelman's trial judge, helping the Bush DOJ convict the state's most prominent Democrat on corruption charges.
Fortunately, concerned citizens of varied political views have stepped forward to research the problem of electronic election fraud and organize grassroots groups fighting for honest elections. Ohio resident James J. Condit, Jr., for example, pioneered protests decades ago against electronic voting fraud. Condit, a conservative who unsuccessfully ran for Congress in 2010 as a Constitution Party candidate, illustrates also that popular anger on the issue can be non-partisan.
Ohio’s 2004 Election
The
big case in the field of electronic elections fraud involves Ohio
returns in the 2004 Presidential race between incumbent Republican
George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the Democrat. Connell’s testimony on Nov. 3, 2008 was a pre-trial deposition in a suit by Ohio voters alleging an election fraud conspiracy led by Republicans running the state government and the election. Defendants in the King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell case include then-Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, below right, Rove and other officials and contractors. Defendants deny impropriety in the Ohio voting, where Bush’s reported margin was 118,775 votes. This enabled him to win the state’s 20 electoral votes and the presidency by an electoral vote of 286 to 251.
Connell described a mind-boggling electronic system whereby Blackwell -- who counted the votes as Secretary of State but also chaired the Ohio Bush-Cheney campaign -- hired Connell's company, GovTech Solutions. GovTech then linked Ohio’s 2004 Presidential election returns on Election Day to the computers of the partisan GOP contractor called SmarTech in Tennessee. Connell denied any wrongdoing, or any fe
ar of retribution for his testimony. But Bob Fitrakis and Clifford Arnebeck, two of the most prominent attorneys for the plaintiffs, held a press conference in July 2008, three months before their deposition, to say that supporters of the suit had received multiple anonymous warnings that Connell would be killed if he proceeded with his deposition. They released a letter to then-Attorney Gen. Michael Mukasey, other authorities and the news media asking for protection for Connell. Fitrakis is a political science professor at Columbus State Community College in Columbus, OH, and an editor of The Free Press, a civil rights group. He has co-authored four books and many articles alleging that Connell’s work helped President Bush’s team steal the 2004 Presidential election. Arneback is legal affairs director of Common Cause branch in Ohio and national co-chair of the Alliance for Democracy.
The
attorneys later said Connell’s testimony on Nov. 3, 2008 turned out to
be so valuable that he would be their star witness at trial along with
Stephen Spoonamore another Republican IT consultant. Spoonamore is a
former IT director for GOP senator and 2008 Presidential nominee John
McCain. He has said the system Connell set up enabled massive fraud that
decided the nation’s 2004 Presidential election. Connell, a longtime
Republican activist, was suspected also of helping enable Bush-Cheney
malfeasance in Florida in 2000. After elections created a Republican
majority in Congress House Republicans awarded Connell contracts to set
up the email system serving both Congress and various partisan
Republican organizations. SmarTech, whose clients included the
anti-Kerry group Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in 2004, ran a private
system for the Bush White House that enabled its users to bypass a
government-run system subject to more rigorous oversight by Congress,
the courts or other watchdogs. It has been reported that Rove used the
SmarTech system for about 95% of his emails.Connell’s 2008 testimony has been the subject of much speculation in voting rights circles. An expert pilot, he die
d at age 45 in a single-plane crash six weeks after his testimony. His Piper Saratoga plane took off from a Maryland airfield for a trip to Ohio. A preliminary federal NTSB investigation failed to determine a cause but found no signs of mischief. Excerpted below are several of the most prominent commentaries on the likelihood of foul play in his death. One is by investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, who photographed the take-off airfield in College Park to show how easy it could have been for a saboteur to have slipped into the vicinity. Madsen, a former Navy investigator and NSA analyst, has written extensively about on how small planes used by political figures are vulnerable to sabotage, including ground-to-air interference difficult for official investigators later to detect. A similar view was voiced in a 2009 column by Rebecca Abrahams, Mike Connell's Family Copes With His Mysterious Death, Tipsters, Legal Options.
Blackwell has taken a lead in denouncing accusers as sore losers. Like other defendants, he has denied wrongdoing both in court papers and in other public statements. But few reporters dare ever press for details or other comments, and Rove does not even bother mentioning the Ohio claims in his 2010 memoir, Courage and Consequence.
Cyber Trail
Connell was a longtime GOP activist motivated in politics by his strong anti-abortion views. In his testimony, he described how he founded two IT consultancies to provide services to the Bush White House, where he worked closely with Rove. Connell's firms were New Media Communications, Inc. and GovTech. In 2000 and 2004, Connell’s New Media Communications helped on campaign IT strategy for the Bush-Cheney ticket and the Republican National Committee. Connell's other firm worked for a various government clients, including: the U.S. House of Representatives; the House Republican Conference; the House Intelligence Committee; the House Judiciary Committee; the House Ways & Means Committee and the House Financial Services Committee.
Connell said he used GovTech for such official government work, and New Media for his partisan, pro-GOP political work. Also, Connell described in his testimony how SmarTech handled such sensitive matters as White House emails, which are supposed to be preserved as government records. Bush officials later said key emails were inadvertently lost when congressional investigators demanded the emails as part of the House Judiciary Committee 2007 investigation of the notorious Bush DOJ purge of nine prosecutors in 2006.
Several
of those fired were Republicans who had resisted political pressure to
bring what they regarded as unwarranted voting fraud cases against
Democrats. Among them was New Mexico U.S. Attorney David Iglesias.
Another was Todd Graves, U.S. attorney for the Kansas City-based western
district of Missouri. Iglesias discusses voting fraud extensively in
his 2008 memoir, In Justice: Inside the Scandal that Rocked the Bush Administration. Iglesias, right, had been appointed to his powerful regional post in the first year of the Bush presidency. He recalls in the book how his Bush colleagues at DOJ headquarters transformed DOJ’s Voting Litigation Section:
While
the emphasis had formerly been on safeguarding the franchise for
disadvantaged citizens of every description, the new emphasis was on
using federal power to expunge from the rolls those who, for whatever
reason, were judged not to belong there.
Iglesias
noted that Graves, another 2001 Bush appointee, was replaced by Bradley
Schlozman, “a DOJ attorney who had made a name for himself by digging
up convenient voter fraud cases, real or imagined.” Schlozman had led
the transformation of DOJ’s Voting Litigation Section. As part of the
U.S. attorney purge, he replaced Graves in March 2006, in time to
announce voting fraud indictments against ACORN (The Association of
Community Organizations for Reform Now). Five days before the 2006
elections, just in time so that news reports would damage Democrats,
Schlozman, below left, announced indictments against four former ACORN
workers who earned $8 an hour to sign up voters in poor neighborhoods.
The workers had been turned in by ACORN itself, and so it was an easy
prosecution. 
Congress
cut off any federal funding for ACORN’s varied community programsin
part because an embezzlement by its founder, and the organization
dissolved in 2010. The Obama administration’s view of the U.S. attorney
purge and the Schlozman decision-making transforming the DOJ's voting
rights section has been, forthe most part, to avoid finger-pointing. Our
Project has gone farther and called the DOJ's final report last summer a
whitewash. We reported that the investigator was herself compromised by
a court-finding of misconduct, and that she focused almost exclusively
on the Iglesias firing. She failed to call key witnesses involving the
other 92 U.S. attorneys offices, including those that the Bush
administration described as "loyal Bushie" prosecutors empowered to
remain in cases such as the Siegelman and ACORN prosecutions around the
nation. The Obama response of closing ranks with Bush predecessors thus
illustrates the president's “look forward not backward” policy he
announced in January 2009 regarding suspected Bush administration
wrongdoing. Meanwhile, Republicans and their media outlets have muddied the waters on election fraud issues by criticizing the DOJ for not taking stronger actions against two Philadelphia members of the New Black Panther Party (a Nation of Islam offshoot), one of whom is alleged to have menaced voters by carrying a police-type billy club outside a polling site in 2008. A party official says the two overdid their attempt to project an image of community strength in the face of what they regarded as potential official efforts to dampen turnout by black and poor voters.
But Christian Adams, one of Schlozman's sub ordinates at DOJ's voting rights section, attracted national news coverage by resigning from the Obama DOJ in protest because it dropped the case that holdover Bush employees had filed in January 2009 against the men and their party, whose leaders have made anti-white comments on various occasions. "Some have called the actions in Philadelphia an isolated incident, not worthy of federal attention," the former DOJ attorney wrote in a Washington Times column republished by Newsmax. "To the contrary, the Black Panthers in October 2008 announced a nationwide deployment for the election. We had indications that polling-place thugs were deployed elsewhere, not only in November 2008, but also during the Democratic primaries, where they targeted white Hillary Rodham Clinton supporters. In any event, the law clearly prohibits even isolated incidents of voter intimidation."
Looking Ahead
Readers
here can judge how that situation compares with the fears of the
Republican IT consultant Spoonamore regarding the 2004 elections. and
the prospects that the same kind of problems still exist, with scant
scrutiny by the news media. Fitrakis, the plaintiffs co-counsel,
summarized in an article July 20 for the Free Press Spoonamore's
testimony and significant new evidence. The evidence included the
contract signed between then-Ohio Secretary of State Blackwell and
Connell's company, plus a graphic architectural map of the Secretary of
State's election-night server layout system. In response to a question
of whether SmarTech, a subsidiary of Airnet, had the capability to
"input data" and thus alter the results of Ohio's 2004 election.
Spoonamore responded: "Yes. They would have had data input capacities.
The system might have been set up to log which source generated the data
but probably did not." "Until now," Fitrakis wrote, "the architectural maps and contracts from the Ohio 2004 election were never made public, which may indicate that the entire system was designed for fraud. In a previous sworn affidavit to the court, Spoonamore swore: "The architecture further confirms how this election was stolen. The computer system and SmarTech had the correct placement, connectivity, and computer experts necessary to change the election in any manner desired by the controllers of the SmarTech computers."
"The transfer of the vote count to SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee remains a mystery, Fitrakis says. "This would have only happened if there was a complete failure of the Ohio computer election system. Connell swore under oath that, "To the best of my knowledge, it was not a fail-over case scenario – or it was not a failover situation....Bob Magnan, a state IT specialist for the secretary of state during the 2004 election, agreed that there was no failover scenario. Magnan said he was unexpectedly sent home at 9 p.m. on election night and private contractors ran the system for Blackwell."
Craig Unger is the author of the 2004 best-seller House of Bush, House of Saud that provided core research for Michael Moore's film, Fahrenheit 9/11, the world's top-grossing "documentary" of all-time. [The category of documentary is a term of art, sometimes controversial, because almost all filmmakers take at least some liberties with time sequences and other facts to dramatize their work.] Unger has been working for months on an investigative article about SmarTech and the 2004 election for Vanity Fair. But major publications do not always publish assignments, even by successful authors. Powerful interests made a major and almost-successful effort, for example, to suppress Fahrenheit.
Stay tuned as coverage of 2012 elections heats up. And keep your eye on the software -- if you can find it.
For Further Research
Updates
Mother Jones, The
Dog That Voted and Other Election Fraud Yarns: The GOP's 10-year
campaign to gin up voter fraud hysteria—and bring back Jim Crow at the
ballot box, Kevin Drum, July / August, 2012. What's the
problem with cracking down on voter fraud? And why shouldn't voters be
required to show photo ID? If you need ID to cash a check or buy a
six-pack, why not to vote? The answer—surprising to many—is
straightforward: Not everyone has, or can easily get, a photo ID.
Among blacks, the young, and the poor—all of whom vote for Democrats
at high rates—the rate was about 80 percent. Overall, 91 percent of
registered Republicans had some form of photo ID, compared to only 83
percent of registered Democrats. Still, Republicans argue, anyone can
obtain a photo ID with a modest amount of effort if they really want
to vote. And isn't this small amount of inconvenience worth it in
order to crack down on fraud? Sure—but first there needs to be some
actual fraud to crack down on. And that turns out to be remarkably
elusive. That's not to say that there's none at all. In a country of
300 million you'll find a bit of almost anything. But multiple studies
taking different approaches have all come to the same conclusion: The
rate of voter fraud in American elections is close to zero. In her
2010 book, The Myth of Voter Fraud, Lorraine
Minnite tracked down every single case brought by the Justice
Department between 1996 and 2005 and found that the number of
defendants had increased by roughly 1,000 percent under Ashcroft. But
that only represents an increase from about six defendants per year to
60, and only a fraction of those were ever convicted of anything. A
New York Times investigation in 2007 concluded that only 86 people had
been convicted of voter fraud during the previous five years. Many of
those appear to have simply made mistakes on registration forms or
misunderstood eligibility rules, and more than 30 of the rest were
penny-ante vote-buying schemes in local races for judge or sheriff. The
investigation found virtually no evidence of any organized efforts to
skew elections at the federal level.Worrall, Simon. Cybergate: Was The White House Stolen By Cyberfraud? Amazon Digital, 2012. Robert Kennedy Jr. calls it " more important than Watergate." In this gripping, investigative work, critically acclaimed author, Simon Worrall, follows the trail of evidence to show that the 2004 Ohio election, which put George Bush into the White House for the second time, may have been hacked. At the center of the drama is Karl Rove's, brilliant IT expert, Michael Connell, who died when his Piper Saratoga plane crashed mysteriously in 2010. Was Connell murdered to cover up the truth? Drawing on extensive, forensic evidence and candid testimonies, including an exclusive interview with Connell's widow, Worrall unravels the mystery of Connell's death. Previously unpublished, secret documents obtained by the author point towards a chilling, possible cause. The result is a dramatic, True Crime story underpinned by colorful characters and painstaking research, which takes the reader inside the shadowy world of electoral fraud. And with a Presidential election looming this year, Worrall's detailed exposure of the vulnerability of digital voting machines to abuse could not be more timely.
Books
Richard Charnin, Proving Election Fraud. AuthorHouse, 2010.
Curtis, Clint, Just A Fly On The Wall. Clint Curtis Publishing, 2004.
Abbe Waldman DeLozier & Vickie Karp, HACKED! High Tech Election Theft in America -- 11 Experts Expose the Truth, Truth Enterprises Publishing, 2006.
Steven F. Freeman and Joel Bleifuss, Foreword by U.S. Representative John Conyers, Jr., Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen?: Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count, Seven Stories Press, 2006.Bob Fitrakis, and Harvey Wasserman, How the GOP Stole America's 2004 Election & Is Rigging 2008, Columbus Institute for Contemporary Journalism, Wasserman.com, 2005.
Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman, eds. Did George W. Bush Steal America’s 2004 Election? Essential Documents, Columbus Institute for Contemporary Journalism, 2005. Available here.
Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman, eds. What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft And Fraud in the 2004 Election, New Press, 2006.
John Fund, Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy, Encounter, 2008.
Bev Harris with David Allen, Black Box Voting Black Box Voting: Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century, Talion, 2004.
Chris Hedges, American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. Free Press, 2006. Includes section describing Ohio Secretary of State W. Kenneth Blackwell's multiple roles in 2004 as elections administrator, Bush-Cheney Ohio campaign co-chairman and a prominent speaker to Christian Right audiences.
Paul S. Herrnson, Richard G. Niemi, Michael J. Hanmer, Benjamin B. Bederson, Frederick C. Conrad, and Michael W. Traugott, Voting Technology: The Not-So-Simple Act of Casting a Ballot, Brookings Institution, 2008.
David Iglesias, In Justice: Inside the Scandal that Rocked the Bush Administration. Wiley, 2008.
Mark Crispin Miller, Fooled Again, Basic Books, 2005, paper book in 2007 with 100-page Afterword documenting lack of coverage by the mainstream media.
Mark Crispin Miller, ed., Loser Take All: Election Fraud and The Subversion of Democracy, 2000 – 2008. IG Publishing, 2008. Essays and research articles by Larisa Alexandrovna, Michael Collins, Lance de Haven-Smith, Bob Fitrakis, Brad Friedman, David L. Griscom, James H. Gundlach, Jean Kaczmarek, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Paul Lehto, David W. Moore, Bruce O’Dell, Michael Richardson, Steven Rosenfeld, Jonathan Simon and Nancy Tobi.
Lorraine C. Minnite, The Myth of Voter Fraud, Cornell University, 2010. Mother Jones synopsis: Lorraine Minnite tracked down every single case brought by the Justice Department between 1996 and 2005 and found that the number of defendants had increased by roughly 1,000 percent under Ashcroft. But that only represents an increase from about six defendants per year to 60, and only a fraction of those were ever convicted of anything. A New York Times investigation in 2007 concluded that only 86 people had been convicted of voter fraud during the previous five years. Many of those appear to have simply made mistakes on registration forms or misunderstood eligibility rules, and more than 30 of the rest were penny-ante vote-buying schemes in local races for judge or sheriff. The investigation found virtually no evidence of any organized efforts to skew elections at the federal level.
Spencer Overton, Stealing Democracy: The New Politics of Voter Suppression. Norton, 2006.
Greg Palast, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, Plume/Penguin, 2003. Reports 91,000 eligible Florida voters voided.
Greg Palast. Armed Madhouse. Dutton, 2006. Includes extensive treatment of election fraud.
Films & Television
50 Ways to Steal an Election: Part 4 of Interview with Stephen Spoonamore, Velvet Revolution video interview by Brett Kimberlin, Sept. 24, 2008.
Murder, Spies & Voting Lies (The Clint Curtis story) (2008) DVD, Brad Friedman (Actor), Clint Curtis (Actor), Patty Sharaf (Director)
Recount, 2008. Starring Kevin Spacey and Bob Balaban. Directed by Jay Roach. Film trailer video.
Recount Democracy, 2002. Documentary directed by Danny Schechter.
Blogs and Articles
2012 (Updated)
National Press Club, ACLU and Heritage Foundation speakers clash over voter identification laws, Lorna Aldrich, Feb. 23, 2012. Laura
Murphy of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Hans von
Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation clashed repeatedly over the effects
of state laws that require voters to show government-issued photo
identification at a Feb. 23 National Press Club Newsmakers news
conference. Both speakers are portrayed at right in a photo by Noel St. John of the Press Club including also moderator Tejinder Singh.
The National Conference of State Legislatures reports that 15 states
now require voters to show photo IDs before voting. In 2012, 31 states
have legislation pending that would add or strengthen voter-ID laws,
according to the state legislatures conference. pakovsky opened by
saying that the key principle of any election is to make sure who is
voting by requiring identification and determining citizenship. “Those
kinds of requirements also increase public confidence in our election
process,” he said. Voter-identification requirements not only prevent
fraud by individuals but also prevent double voting and voting in the
names of dead people still on the rolls," Spakovsky said. Murphy
responded that the statistics were flawed because they did not account
for African-American migration to Georgia and Indiana. She added that
the statistics could only count people who voted and could not address
the number of people prevented from voting because of the laws.
Minorities, low income people and rural people faced hardships acquiring
photo IDs even in states that issue them for free, Murphy said. She
reasoned that many people do not have a birth certificate or other
required documentation to support issuance of a photo ID. They may not
have the money, time off from jobs, or transportation to acquire the
supporting documents, she added. “There are hundreds of polling places
but there are not hundreds of places issuing photo IDs,” Murphy said.
2011
Washington Post, Virginia’s ballot-access laws turn tables on GOP,
Ezra Klein, Dec. 29, 2011. Of the seven candidates still in serious
contention for the Republican nomination for the presidency, only two of
them — Mitt Romney and Ron Paul — will be appearing in the Virginia
primary on March 6. Republicans are furious. Some of them blame the
candidates who failed to qualify. But other Republicans — and most of
the candidates — have turned their fire on Virginia. But it runs counter
to the efforts Republicans have mounted in dozens of states to make it
more difficult for ordinary Americans to participate in the 2012
election. Thirty-four states have introduced — and seven have passed —
strict laws requiring photo IDs. It’s not just photo ID laws, of course.
Thirteen states have introduced bills to end same-day and election-day
voter registration. Nine states have introduced laws restricting early
voting, and four more have introduced proposals to restrict absentee
voting. Two states have reversed decisions allowing ex-convicts to vote,
and 12 states have introduced laws requiring proof of citizenship.
Nationally, House Republicans voted to do away with the Election
Assistance Commission.
Daily Kos /OpEd News, Wisconsin wanders into poll tax territory,
Chris Bowers, Sept. 10, 2011. A Wisconsin official has discouraged
state workers from volunteering information about free IDs available
under a controversial voter identification law that critics complain is
designed to suppress votes, a memo leaked on Wednesday showed.The
memo, provided to the press by Democratic State Senator Jon Erpenbach,
was likely to fan concerns among critics of the Republican-backed law
that it aimed to suppress votes of thousands of otherwise eligible
Wisconsin voters. The 24th amendment to the Constitution made it
illegal to deny or abridge a citizen's right to vote in federal
elections due to their failure to pay a poll tax or any other kind of
tax. Now that Wisconsin, along with several other states, requires
official state identification in order to vote, those states are
constitutionally required to provide citizens with a free version of
the ID. Rolling Stone, The GOP War on Voting, Ari Berman, Sept. 15, 2011. In a campaign supported by the Koch brothers, Republicans are working to prevent millions of Democrats from voting next year. As the nation gears up for the 2012 presidential election, Republican officials have launched an unprecedented, centrally coordinated campaign to suppress the elements of the Democratic vote that elected Barack Obama in 2008. Just as Dixiecrats once used poll taxes and literacy tests to bar black Southerners from voting, a new crop of GOP governors and state legislators has passed a series of seemingly disconnected measures that could prevent millions of students, minorities, immigrants, ex-convicts and the elderly from casting ballots.
OpEd News, Hacking Our Elections With Big Money And Power, Michael Collins and Sheila Parks, Aug. 23, 2011. In 2004, Wally O'Dell, CEO and Chair of the Board of Diebold, said he would help deliver Ohio to Bush. And he did. Election fraud has been going on at least since 1970. Read the book Votescam, by the late great brothers, James and Kenneth Collier. The fraud of the electronic voting machines, coupled with the complicity of the corporate media and the politicians, are not glitches, errors, anomalies. To begin to solve this mess, we must immediately go to secure, hand-counted paper ballot elections. To see a video interview with James Collier go here.
BradBlog, 'There is No Way for Them to be Tampered With': Mississippi Election Clerk Gets Approval to Remove Paper Trail Printers from Diebold Touch-Screens, Brad Friedman, Aug. 18, 2011. Last week, e-voting system failures -- such as e-voting machines that wouldn't start up at all and votes that were counted twice -- led to chaos and uncertain results in Mississippi's state primaries, leading one official to declare days afterward, as they were all struggling to sort out results of several close elections: "At this point there is no election...Everyone is baffled." Against that backdrop then, the Jones County Board of Supervisors approved the removal of printers from the county’s voting machines at the request of Jones County Circuit Clerk Bart Gavin at Monday’s board meeting in Laurel.
Heritage Foundation, Voter Photo Identification: Protecting the Security of Elections, Hans von Spakovsky,
July 13, 2011. http://justice-integrity.org/images/biz/hans_von_spakovsky.png Voter fraud may be a part of America’s history, but it does not have to be a part of America’s future. Six states—Georgia, Indiana, Texas, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Kansas—have recently adopted laws requiring voters to produce a photograph identification card (voter ID) when they vote at their polling places on Election Day. Such voter ID laws are under attack from opponents armed with an array of claims—specious allegations and over-the-top tales of voter disenfranchisement—but courts continue to rule in favor of voter ID requirements. Therefore, states should continue to pursue voter ID laws. They have a valid and legitimate state interest not only in deterring and detecting voter fraud, but also in maintaining the confidence of their citizens in the security of U.S. elections.
Election Defense Alliance, What Happened in Wisconsin? We Don't Know and That's Not Good, Jonathan Simon Aug. 12, 2011. On Tuesday August 9th, a group of volunteers from around Wisconsin conducted Citizen Exit Polls in two of the six senate districts where recall elections took place. In every case there are sizeable disparities between the computer-tabulated votecount percentages and the percentages indicated by our exit polls respondents. And in every case the disparity is a “red shift,” the votecount percentages more favorable to the Republican candidate than are the exit poll percentages.
News from Underground, What do the numbers tell us re: Wisconsin recalls? That the Democrats may well have won ALL SIX, Richard Charnin, Aug. 12, 2011. In a pre-election post, I indicated that only election fraud could keep the Democrats from winning three of the six GOP recall elections. They won two. This post-election analysis indicates that they did much better than that. They may very well have won all six. The analysis is based on the Wisconsin Recall True Vote Model.
Fox News, Nevada Judge Calls ACORN 'Reprehensible,' Slaps Group With Maximum Fine for Voter Fraud, Eric Shawn, August 10, 2011. A Nevada judge on Wednesday imposed a fine of $5,000 on ACORN, the defunct grass-roots community organization. ACORN pleaded guilty to one felony count of unlawful compensation for registration of voters in its Las Vegas office during in the 2008 race by paying a bonus to workers to sign up 21 or more voters per shift. It is illegal in Nevada to pay bonuses to register voters.
Politicus, Recall Fraud: Wisconsin Democrats Accuse Republicans of Vote Tampering, Jason Easley, August 10, 2011. As Yogi Berra once said it’s déjà vu all over again as for Wisconsin Democrats as they allege that the Waukesha County clerk is once again tampering with votes to hand an election to the Republicans. Here is the statement of Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Mike Tate: “The race to determine control of the Wisconsin Senate has fallen in the hands of the Waukesha County clerk, who has already distinguished herself as incompetent, if not worse. She is once more tampering with the results of a consequential election and in the next hours we will determine our next course of action.”
Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government, Fraud Inundates Wisconsin Senate Recall, Media Trackers, Aug. 4, 2011. Imitating the infamous “smokes for votes” scandal of the 2000 election, a small leftwing Wisconsin front group has been caught handing out barbecue chicken dinners to those who vote early in the Wisconsin recall elections. During the 2000 campaign a wealthy liberal activist was caught passing out cigarettes to Milwaukee’s homeless in exchange for their vote in the all-important presidential election. Over a decade later, Wisconsin Jobs Now!, a small group sponsored by the union umbrella Citizen Action of Wisconsin, hosted “block parties” in northern Milwaukee and essentially paid citizens to vote.
Brad Blog, Matthew Vadum, Master of Misinformation, Subverts the Truth With More Democratic 'Voter Fraud' Lies, Brad Friedman, Aug. 1, 2011. Matthew Vadum will lie about anything he needs to in order to collect his wingnut welfare paychecks apparently. Vadum's latest misinformative article, as published by Tucker Carlson's The Daily Caller and, predictably, echoed around the intellectually dishonest and incurious wingnut blogosphere last week, picks up where his recently published propaganda book about ACORN leaves off. That his silly book fails to detail even a single ballot box "stuffed" by ACORN is little surprise. There exists no actual evidence, after all, of any illegal vote ever having been cast by any voter who was improperly registered by an ACORN worker.cccc
OpEd News, Bob Fitrakis on New Evidence of 2004 Stolen Election in Ohio, Joan Brunwasser, right, July 28, 2011. My guest today is Bob Fitrakis, author, journalist, editor and publisher of The Free Press. Welcome back to OpEd News, Bob. We last
spoke
back in April after you wrote a powerful piece called: "Ohio
Republicans pass new Jim Crow 'voter ID' law to disenfranchise 900,000
voters." Things
seem to be going from bad to worse. There are more revelations
regarding the 2004 Ohio presidential election, which you've written
about extensively over the years. For many of our readers, 2004 is the
distant past. Can you walk us through it, Bob? Why does it matter now,
all these years later?
The
electronic vote count apparatus that was put together to steal the 2004
election is still with us today. We still allow private partisan
for-profit companies to control our software and hardware in the
election process. In the new court filing in the
King-Lincoln-Bronzeville case, instead of us and others being dismissed
as "conspiracy theorists," people can make up their own minds. They can
look at the architectural map showing how J. Kenneth Blackwell,
then-Ohio Secretary of State, allowed private contractors to outsource
the Ohio 2004 presidential vote count on election night to a private
company, SmarTech, in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The court case was stalled
after the tragic of Bush IT guru Michael Connell in December 2008, one
month after we took his deposition about the outsourcing of the vote
count in 2004. People have a chance to look at our brief and Connell's
under oath deposition with this new filing.
Free Press, New court filing reveals how the 2004 Ohio presidential election was hacked,
Bob Fitrakis, July 20, 2011. A new filing in the King Lincoln
Bronzeville v. Blackwell case includes a copy of the Ohio Secretary of
State election production system configuration that was in use in Ohio's
2004 presidential election when there was a sudden and unexpected shift
in votes for George W. Bush.Heritage Foundation, Voter Photo Identification: Protecting the Security of Elections, Hans von Spakovsky,
July 13, 2011. http://justice-integrity.org/images/biz/hans_von_spakovsky.png Voter fraud may be a part of America’s history, but it does not have to be a part of America’s future. Six states—Georgia, Indiana, Texas, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Kansas—have recently adopted laws requiring voters to produce a photograph identification card (voter ID) when they vote at their polling places on Election Day. Such voter ID laws are under attack from opponents armed with an array of claims—specious allegations and over-the-top tales of voter disenfranchisement—but courts continue to rule in favor of voter ID requirements. Therefore, states should continue to pursue voter ID laws. They have a valid and legitimate state interest not only in deterring and detecting voter fraud, but also in maintaining the confidence of their citizens in the security of U.S. elections.
U.S. News, Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Needs Fraud Investigation, Peter Roff, April, 2011. Partisans on both sides were ready to scream “fraud at polls” as the balloting wound down in Wisconsin in the recent state Supreme Court election. Something needs to be done. It’s time for a bipartisan effort to look at the entire election. As the Wall Street Journal's John Fund wrote recently, “An independent investigation is called for, if for no other reason than to clear the air and to recommend procedures to ensure such errors don't happen again. Just as many Wisconsin officials have ignored or downplayed evidence of vote fraud (see the Milwaukee Police Department's 2008 detailed investigation) so too have sloppy election procedures been allowed to fester in some counties.”
2010
Nieman Watchdog, New Questions Raised About Prosecutor Who Cleared Bush Officials in U.S. Attorney Firings,
Andrew Kreig/Justice Integrity Project, July 25, 2010. Four days before
Nora Dannehy was appointed to investigate the Bush administration’s
U.S. attorney firing scandal, a team of lawyers she led was found to
have illegally suppressed evidence in a major political corruption case.
Andrew Kreig writes that this previously unreported fact calls her
entire investigation into question as well as that of a similar
investigation by her colleague John Durham of DOJ and CIA
decision-making involving torture.
Newsmax, Ex-DOJ Attorney: New Black Panther Cover-up, J. Christian Adams, June 27, 2010. On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters and poll watchers. After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs.
Maxim, The Mysterious Death of Bush's Cyber-Guru, Simon Worrall, Feb. 10, 2010. By any calculation, the Ohio 2004 election was a black day for American democracy. Lou Harris, known as the “father of modern political polling,” and a man not given to hyperbole, called it “as dirty an election as America has ever seen.” All the exit polls suggested Ohio would go to Kerry. But when the vote was counted George Bush had won by 132,685 votes, adding Ohio’s crucial 20 Electoral College votes to his tally. And putting him, not Kerry, into the White House. It has since been alleged that at several points on election night, the Ohio secretary of state’s official Web site, which was responsible for reporting the results, was being hosted by a server in a basement in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
2009
Brad Blog, Mike Connell's Family Copes With His Mysterious Death, Tipsters, Legal Options, Rebecca M. Abrahams, Nov. 9, 2009. On December 18, 2008, Bush IT expert Mike Connell, a highly skilled pilot, was killed in a sudden crash while flying his small aircraft from Washington DC to his Akron/Canton home airport. Former CIA operative John Perkins wrote about "jackals" in his book, Confessions of an Economic HitMan, and says while he doesn't have any inside knowledge about Connell's death, he would not be surprised if he was murdered. Perkins adds, plane crashes have always been a weapon of choice among Jackals. "It' so easy to cover it up. The evidence is destroyed and everybody knows airplanes are fragile anyway, small airplanes in particular."
Huffington Post, Siegelman Deserves New Trial Because of Judge’s ‘Grudge’, Evidence Shows; $300 Million in Bush Military Contracts Awarded to Judge’s Private Company, Andrew Kreig, May 15, 2009. The Alabama federal judge who presided over the 2006 corruption trial of the state's former governor holds a grudge against the defendant for helping to expose the judge's own alleged corruption six years ago. Former Gov. Don Siegelman therefore deserves a new trial with an unbiased judge ─ not one whose privately owned company, Doss Aviation, has been enriched by the Bush administration's award of $300 million in contracts since 2006.
Cleveland Free Times, Point Of Impact: If There Was A Plot To Steal The 2004 Election, Michael Connell Knew About It. Is That Why He's Dead? James Renner, Jan. 21, 2009. Ken Stewart's Lodge is a dimly lit upscale restaurant and bar in Bath, a favorite haunt of local Republican bigwigs and businessmen. On the evening of December 19, 2008, a strange crowd filtered in: skinny guys with bashful smiles, pudgy dudes with pale skin, accompanied by the occasional female. An IT herd. These particular techies came from New Media Communications, the company that builds and services websites for America's most prominent conservatives, from Ken Blackwell to W. himself. Their boss had booked Ken Stewart's for their Christmas party. But the boss wasn't there yet. He was flying in from Washington, D.C. as his employees hit the bar.
AVweb, NTSB Releases Preliminary Report On Connell Crash, Glenn Pew, January 4, 2009. The NTSB has released its preliminary report on the Piper Turbo Saratoga crash on approach to Akron-Canton airport Dec. 19, 2008, that killed Michael Connell, Republican media consultant and chief IT consultant for Karl Rove. The crash ignited the minds of conspiracy theorists aware that Connell had been subpoenaed for expert testimony regarding alleged electronic voter fraud in 2004, and amid one report by a CBS affiliate that Connell had been warned his plane might be sabotaged.
Wayne Madsen Report, Connell's high-tech network active against Gore in 2000, Wayne Madsen, December 22-23, 2008 (Subscription required). WMR has learned from knowledgeable Republican Party sources that Mike Connell, the GOP's information technology maestro who was killed in a suspicious plane crash last Friday night while flying from the Washington, DC area back to Akron, Ohio, was involved in a high-tech operation targeting Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000.
Huffington Post, Key Witness in Rove Probes Killed, Michael Carmichael, December 21, 2008. Mike Connell's untimely death will haunt Karl Rove and the Republican Party. As the key witness in investigations into election fraud and the destruction of White House emails relevant to the improper firing of US attorneys, Mike Connell recently informed investigators that he had received death threats while Cliff Arnebeck, a principal in an Ohio election fraud investigation wrote a letter to US Attorney General Michael Mukasey charging that Karl Rove had threatened Connell.
Free Press, The suspicious, disturbing death of election rigger Michael Connell, Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman, Dec. 20, 2008. Michael Connell, the crucial techno-lynch pin in the theft of the 2004 election, and much more, is dead at the age of 45. His unnatural, suspicious death raises serious questions about the corruption of the American electoral process that now may never be answered. Connell died Friday, December 19 when his Piper Saratoga plane crashed near his northern Ohio home. He was flying himself home from the College Park, Maryland airport. An accomplished pilot, flying in unremarkable weather, his death cuts off a critical path to much of what may never be known about how the 2004 election was shifted from John Kerry to George W. Bush in the wee hours of November 2. His plane crashed between two houses in an upscale neighborhood, one vacant, just 2.5 miles from the Akron-Canton airport.
New York Times, Lawsuit Adds to Turmoil for Community Group, Stephanie Strom, Sept. 9, 2008. In the wake of an embezzlement scandal that rocked the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or Acorn, two of its board members are seeking a court order to force it to hand over financial documents. They also are seeking to sever what they describe as continuing ties between Acorn and its founder, Wade Rathke, who resigned after it became public this summer that his brother had embezzled almost $1 million from the organization eight years ago. They contend that Mr. Rathke continues to direct the staff and expenditures.
Wayne Madsen Report, GOP convention provides Big Brother services to delegates, Wayne Madsen, Sept. 5, 2008. (Subscription required).
WMR has learned from a reliable source that the GOP convention
organizers in St. Paul installed special microphones and cameras in the
Xcel Energy Center in order to monitor who delegates were chatting
with and listen in on their conversations. Similar technology, WMR is
told, was used by the Republicans at the 2004 national convention in
New York at Madison Square Garden. The eavesdropping on state
delegations involved the use of powerful pan, zoom, and tilt camera
technology and noise-canceling shotgun microphones, similar to those
used sporting events by broadcasters. The cover for the eavesdropping
equipment was that it was part of Internet coverage for the convention.
Yesterday, The Washington Times reported on the presence of "Black
Hat" squads on the convention floor in St. Paul that tracked Ron Paul
supporters and other potential disruptors. Wearing black ballcaps with
white stars, the squads were authorized to yank delegates' credentials
and remove them from the convention floor.New York Times, Lawsuit Adds to Turmoil for Community Group, Stephanie Strom, Sept. 9, 2008. In the wake of an embezzlement scandal that rocked the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or Acorn, two of its board members are seeking a court order to force it to hand over financial documents. They also are seeking to sever what they describe as continuing ties between Acorn and its founder, Wade Rathke, who resigned after it became public this summer that his brother had embezzled almost $1 million from the organization eight years ago. They contend that Mr. Rathke continues to direct the staff and expenditures.
Brad Blog, Rove Threatened GOP IT Guru If He Does Not 'Take the Fall' for Election Fraud in Ohio, Says Attorney, Brad Friedman, July 24, 2011. Letter Sent to Attorney General Mukasey Requesting 'Protection for Mr. Connell and His Family From This Reported Attempt to Intimidate a Witness' After Tip from 'Credible Source.' OH AG Reportedly Asked to Provide Immunity Protection.
Brad Blog, Ohio Attorney Files to Lift Stay on '04 Election Case, Cites Allegations, Evidence of Massive Fraud by a Number of GOP Operatives, Steve Heller, July 17, 2008. Leading Data Security Expert Joins Press Conference, Case, Notes Fraudulent Patterns That Should Have Triggered Investigation. At a press conference this morning in Columbus, Ohio, Cliff Arnebeck, lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the case of King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell, announced that he is filing a motion to "lift the stay in the case [and] proceed with targeted discovery in order to help protect the integrity of the 2008 election."
2007
Washington Post, Ex-Prosecutor Says He Didn't Think Charges Would Affect Election, Dan Eggen, June 6, 2007. A former interim U.S. attorney appointed by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales defended his decision to bring a controversial indictment before last year's elections, telling the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had no idea Missouri Republicans would use the case as part of their campaign against Democrats. Bradley J. Schlozman, who temporarily replaced dismissed U.S. attorney Todd P. Graves of Kansas City, Mo., also said that career officials in the department's public integrity section approved the case, in which four former employees of a liberal-leaning group were charged with voter-registration fraud. "I did not think it was going to influence the election at all," Schlozman said. But Graves, who also testified yesterday, said he would have handled the case differently. "It would have been my understanding that you would not do that," Graves said. "It surprised me that they'd been filed that close to an election."
Boston Globe, Missouri attorney a focus in firings, Senate bypassed in appointment of Schlozman, Charlie Savage, May 6, 2007. Todd Graves brought just four misdemeanor voter fraud indictments during his five years as the US attorney for western Missouri -- even though some of his fellow Republicans in the closely divided state wanted stricter oversight of Democratic efforts to sign up new voters.
2006
Election Defense Alliance, Landslide Denied: Exit Polls vs. Vote Count 2006, Jonathan Simon and Bruce O’Dell, Nov. 16, 2006. There was an unprecedented level of concern approaching the 2006 Election (“E2006”) about the vulnerability of the vote counting process to manipulation. Unfortunately the evidence forces us to a very different and disturbing conclusion: there was gross vote count manipulation and it had a great impact on the results of E2006, significantly decreasing the magnitude of what would have been, accurately tabulated, a landslide of epic proportions. Because much of this manipulation appears to have been computer-based, and therefore invisible to the legions of at-the-poll observers, the public remains unaware of the far greater story: The electoral machinery and vote counting systems of the United States did not honestly and accurately translate the public will and certainly cannot be counted on to do so in the future.
KMBC-TV (Kansas City, ACORN Workers Indicted For Alleged Voter Fraud, Nov. 1, 2006. Four people have been indicted on charges of voter fraud in Kansas City, officials said Wednesday. Investigators said questionable registration forms for new voters were collected by a group that works to improve minority and low-income communities. ACORN officials in Kansas City said they turned in the four people who were indicted. "We're very happy that they were indicted," said Claudie Harris with ACORN. Harris said ACORN workers are paid by the hour and not by the number of voter registration cards they turn in. ACORN officials said the four indicted have been fired.
Rolling Stone, Was the 2004 Election Stolen? by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., June 15, 2006. Rolling Stone link no longer functional but article available here via Common Dreams. Exclusive documents. Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House. Despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations. A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states, was discovered shredding Democratic registrations. In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes, malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots. Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast. The reports were especially disturbing in Ohio, the critical battleground state that clinched Bush's victory in the electoral college.
2005
Tom.Paine.com, What Didn't Happen In Ohio, Russ Baker, May 5, 2005. Back in January, I wrote a piece for TomPaine.com questioning widely circulated claims that the election in Ohio had been stolen. I had done some poking around, anticipating that at least some of the frightening anecdotes filling our mail boxes and raging on talk radio would be borne out. They weren’t. In spot checks on a few popular fraud anecdotes, I found credible alternative explanations such as incompetence, structural problems, politicization of decision-making and other failings— but no evidence of deliberate fraud designed to hand the election to Bush.
Let’s Try Democracy, Media Whites Out Vote Fraud, David Swanson, Jan. 3, 2005. The Cleveland Federation of Labor is sending busloads of demonstrators to a rally in Columbus, Ohio, today to take part in a protest of election fraud in the 2004 presidential election. As detailed below, there is strong evidence of vote theft in Ohio. But to anyone who gets their news from a television or from most print media, these protesters are kidding themselves. Last week I received this email from the Columbus Dispatch, "You say the rally is to protest the fraud that took place in the election. Where did this fraud occur? Who did it? How did they do it? Thanx." Two months after the election, an editor at ground zero was (seriously or sarcastically) asking a stranger and an amateur to tell him from Washington where the fraud had occurred. I immediately sent him a reply. And I didn't hear anything further.
2004
Free Press, Startling New Revelations Highlight Rare Congressional Hearings on Ohio Vote,
Bob Fitrakis, left, Steven Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman, Dec. 13,
2004. Startling new revelations about Ohio's presidential vote have been
uncovered as Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee join
Rev. Jesse Jackson in Columbus, the state capital, on Monday, Dec. 13,
to hold a rare field hearing into election malfeasance and manipulation
in the 2004 vote. The Congressional delegation will include Rep. John
Conyers (D-MI), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones,
and others. Taken together, the revelations show Republicans – in state
and county government, and in the Ohio Republican Party – were
determined to undermine and suppress Democratic turnout by a wide
variety of methods.Brad Blog, Clint Curtis ‘Stuns’ Judiciary Committee Hearings in Ohio With ‘Jaw-Dropping’ Sworn Testimony; Publicly names Feeney in front of Committee as asking him to develop ‘vote-rigging’ software! Brad Friedman, Dec. 13, 2004. The Brad Blog has just received an exclusive first-hand account of Clint Curtis' sworn testimony (as reported earlier) to the Judiciary Committee Democrats holding hearings this morning in Columbus, Ohio on Election 2004 Voting Irregularities. The software programmer, whose sworn affidavit was first reported by The Brad Blog, named Republican U.S. Congressman Tom Feeney (a member of the Judiciary Committe
e!)
as having asked him to create "vote-rigging" software in a meeting at
Yang Enterprises, Inc. prior to the 2000 elections! Feeney was, at the
time of the alleged meeting, a Florida legislator and later became
Speaker of the Florida House. He was also the running mate to Jeb Bush
in his failed 1994 bid for Florida Governor.YouTube, Computer Programmer Clint Curtis Testimony He Was Requested to Write Code to Rig U.S. Elections, Dec. 13, 2004. Former Yang lobbyist Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer from Florida, testified before a congressional panel that there are computer programs that can be used to secretly fix elections. He explains how he created a prototype for Florida. In September 2004, Curtis, right, self-published Just A Fly On The Wall, a book critical of the George W. Bush administration, Yang Enterprises, and Tom Feeney. In the edition of that book published before the 2004 election, Curtis focused on his earlier accusations against Yang, as well as accusations that Feeney used his influence with the Florida State government to Yang's benefit.
Chattanooga Times, Airnet Hosts GOP Internet Sites in 2004, Andy Sher, August 22, 2004. It's more than 700 miles from Madison Square Garden, but that won't stop Chattanooga from "hosting" next week's Republican National Convention in New York City. Chattanooga-based Smartech Corp. is serving as Web host for the convention, bringing the event to computer screens across the globe. The company will provide convention speeches, video-on-demand "streams" and live shots of events through powerful Web servers, most of which are at Smartech's headquarters in downtown Chattanooga.
2003
Johns Hopkins Information Security Institute, Analysis of an Electronic Voting System: Technical Report TR-2003-19 (with
Response to Diebold's Technical Analysis), Tadayoshi Kohno, Adam Stubblefield, Aviel D. Rubin, Dan S. Wallach, July 23, 2003. Diebold posted an analysis of our report. Throughout their document, they refer to details of our paper as "allegations," and they attempt to argue away these allegations with logic that is often contrived. We have no personal ill-will toward Diebold as a company; our aim was to provide a technical analysis of the code that we had at our disposal. While our conclusions have upset those who stand to lose financially from these conclusions and those who are embarrassed by decisions they have made without the knowledge of the insecurity in the code, we firmly stand behind our findings.
