Monday, March 24, 2014

Bill Maher on Framing Your Message

Bill Maher explains the power of language framing 

and how Democrats can use it


On Friday night, Bill Maher explained how Democrats must win back the language framing from the Republicans.
Being a Republican means starting with a bedrock principle, like rich people shouldn't pay taxes, or black people shouldn't vote.  (audience laughter)  And then, figuring out how to sell it to low-information voters, otherwise known as Americans.  Did I say "don't tax rich people"?  I meant "encourage the job creators".  Did I say "don't let black people vote"?  I meant "clamp down on voter fraud".  Did I say "bring back slavery"?  I meant "phase out race-based freedom quotas".  (audience laughter and applause)
Video and full transcript below the fold.

And finally, New Rule: Democrats need to stop despairing about the gloomy midterm predictions, and realize there's actually a glimmer of hope, and it has to do with suicide.  Let me finish.  For decades now, liberals pushed the issue of assisted suicide, and it got nowhere.  Then, they started to call it "aid in dying", and its approval shot up 20 points and it's now legal in 5 states.  That's the power of language.  And if they took the word "dying" out altogether and called it "early retirement"?  (audience laughter)  It would probably win over 10 more states.  If they called it "death by chocolate", they could get all 50!  (audience laughter and applause) Now, that success and the success that Democrats had in rebranding gay marriage as "marriage equality" means they have finally caught on to what Republicans learned a long time ago from their guru on words, deranged madman/friend of the show Frank Luntz.

Frank is the genius right-wing wordsmith who taught Republicans to, instead of saying "estate tax", say "death tax".  Instead of saying "poor people", say "the takers".  Instead of saying "ridiculous toupee", say "healthy head of natural human hair".  (audience laughter)
And what Democrats need to do is start out-Luntzing the Republicans on all the issues.  What's the difference between "drilling for oil" and "energy exploration"?  Nothing, except one sounds like something assholes do, and one sounds like Indiana Jones.  Health care reform?  Everyone likes that.  "Government takeover of health care".  What are you, Hitler?  What's the difference between creationism and intelligent design?  Not IQ points.  (audience laughter)
Being a Republican means starting with a bedrock principle, like rich people shouldn't pay taxes, or black people shouldn't vote.  (audience laughter)  And then, figuring out how to sell it to low-information voters, otherwise known as Americans.  Did I say "don't tax rich people"?  I meant "encourage the job creators".  Did I say "don't let black people vote"?  I meant "clamp down on voter fraud".  Did I say "bring back slavery"?  I meant "phase out race-based freedom quotas".  (audience laughter and applause)
Republicans are always confident they can move the needle on any issue because, A) they know they have the right words to make the hamster hit the pedal.  And B) they have the discipline with those words.  Perhaps you noticed how everyone on the right universally decided at the exact same moment that Obama's "weakness" is what "emboldened" Putin to take Crimea.  And that's not a matter of great minds thinking alike, because for that, you would need great minds.  (audience laughter and applause)
No, that's because once the word is decided on, every single Republican, from the presidential contenders on down to the feces-throwers on hate radio (audience laughter), all chant it like Rain Man over and over until it's beaten into our skulls.
Now I have no hope the Democrats will ever get that organized.  But they could at least keep up the winning streak in the word game.  Starting with, liberals must stop saying they "believe" in climate change or "believe" in evolution.  Evolution is; it's not matter of believing in it.  (massive audience cheering and applause)
I don't believe that water boils at 212°; that's how hot it is when it happens!  It's not ideology, it's soup!  (audience laughter)  But most of all, just remember, you win the word game, you win the issue.
Jesus was for feeding the poor.  Rename food stamps: "Christ coupons".  (audience laughter and applause)  Marijuana legalization should be called "creating green jobs".  (audience laughter and applause)  Abortion is a "natal do-over".  (audience groans)  And illegal aliens are "refried Americans".  (audience groans)
And solar energy has always sounded way too gay for rednecks.  Instead, say "invade the Sun and take its oil"!  (audience laughter and applause)
 Let's not forget Professor George Lakoff who started "Framing" political issues

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Outlawing Union Picketing is UnConstitutional

Tennessee Attorney General: 

Bill Banning Union Picketing is UnConstitutional

 
 
PICO RIVERA, CA OCTOBER 4, 2012 - Walmart employees strike out side of a Walmart store in Pico Rivera, California on Thursday October 4, 2012. The employees accuse Walmart of unlawful retaliation against workers who speak out for change at the company. Th
Soon to be banned in Tennessee?
 
A Republican bill to criminalize union picketing has been moving through the Tennessee State House, with a committee vote coming up soon. But it may be running into a snag: Tennessee Attorney General Robert Cooper says the bill violates the First Amendment.
“HB1688 presents a content-based restriction upon speech. It would criminalize ‘any form of mass picketing activity in the context of a strike, lockout, or other labor dispute’,” the opinion says.
It notes the bill "includes labor-dispute-specific proscriptions on conduct that do not apply in non-labor contexts. Furthermore, the injunction provision of HB1688… would establish a different standard for business and private-property owners who are the targets of labor-related mass picketing.”
The question, of course, is whether likely UnConstitutionality is enough of a reason for Tennessee Republicans to back off of limiting speech because they don't like who's speaking, or what they're saying.    An early response from state Rep. Jeremy Durham, the bill's sponsor, suggests he's not backing down without a fight. 
 

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Rep. Ron Paul Calls Sanctions "War"

Ron Paul slams US on Crimea crisis,

Russia sanctions are 'an Act of War'

• Paul tells Guardian change in Ukraine is US-backed coup
Ron Paul
Ron Paul has run for president three times. Photograph: Jim Cole/AP
The former Republican congressman and three-time presidential candidate Ron Paul has launched a scathing attack on what he calls a US-backed coup in Ukraine, insisting the Crimean people have the right to align their territory with Moscow and characterising sanctions against Russia as “an Act of War”.

He also said providing economic aid to Ukraine was comparable to giving support to rebels in Syria knowing it would end up in the hands of al-Qaida.

The libertarian guru’s remarks in an interview with the Guardian are almost diametrically opposed to those of his son, the Republican presidential hopeful Rand Paul, who has called for stiff penalties against Russia and declared: “If I were president, I wouldn’t let [Russian president] Vladimir Putin get away with it.”

Ron Paul, who retired from his Texas congressional seat in 2012, has always adopted a sceptical view of US foreign interventions. He said that although the US had not been involved in any military overthrow of the government in Kiev, it had facilitated a coup in the sense of “agitating” elements who wanted to usurp Ukraine’s former president, Victor Yanukovych.

“The evidence is pretty clear that the NGOs [non-governmental organisations] financed by our government have been agitating with billions of dollars, trying to get that government changed,” he said. “Our hands are not clean.”

There is broad bipartisan support on Capitol Hill for the movement that brought about the departure of Yanukovych, as well as criticism of Putin for Russia’s military intervention in Crimea, which many view as a prelude to annexing the territory.

A Russian-backed referendum, in which Crimeans will be asked if they want to align their government with Moscow, will take place on Sunday, although western leaders argue the poll has no legitimacy or legal basis.

Paul said Crimeans should be allowed to break away from Kiev. 

“I think everyone should have right to express themselves,” he said. “It is messy, that is for sure, because two big governments are very much involved in trying to tell the Ukranians what to do.”
However he said Russia had a more justifiable basis for being involved in Crimea than the US, and no government should prevent locals on the peninsula from determining their future.

“That is our how our country was started,” he said. “It was the right of self-determination, and voting, and asking and even fighting for it, and seceding. Of course libertarians were delighted with the secession of the various countries and units of government away from the Soviet Union, so yes, we want the people to make the decisions.”
 
He added: “The people of Ukraine would probably have a loose-knit association, with a rather independent east and west, and an independent Crimea. It would work quite well.”
Paul, who now runs his own internet TV channel, also took issue with a $1bn aid package for Ukraine which is going through Congress.

“Now we’re getting involved with the Europeans in trying to change the government of Ukraine,” he said. “Now they want our money. It is just like when we when we go out and try and throw out [Syrian president Bashar al-] Assad, we end up working with al-Qaida. Now we’re likely to give money to Ukraine so they can pay their bills to Russia. That is the insanity of it all.”
His son, an increasingly strong contender for the Republican presidential nomination, made a similar point in the Senate on Thursday, when he voted against a bill providing aid to Ukraine.

The Kentucky senator is far more pragmatic than his father, however, and is on a mission to recast his reputation as a mainstream potential commander-in-chief. This week, he used an op-ed piece in Time magazine to exhibit his foreign policy credentials, adopting a tough stance against Moscow.
“ladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is a gross violation of that nation’s sovereignty and an affront to the international community,” he wrote. “His continuing occupation of Ukraine is completely unacceptable, and Russia’s president should be isolated for his actions.”

He added: “Economic sanctions and visa bans should be imposed and enforced without delay.”
Ron Paul, Rand Paul
Ron Paul with his son Rand, at a 2011 presidential campaign event. 
Photograph: Charles Dharapak/AP
His father took the opposite view. “I think sanctions are horrible. They’re Acts of War,” he told the Guardian.

“It is based on a moral principle of theft. They want to target sanctions against 20 or 30 bad Russians who they claim have committed a crime against humanity, and therefore we’re going to freeze their assets and steal them from them.”

When it was suggested his position was opposite to that of his son, Paul replied: “Neither he nor I have ever pretended our views are identical. He still has the most libertarian views in the Senate.”

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

4 Post Office Unions Fight GOP Cuts

Four Postal Unions Form Alliance to Defend the Public Postal Service - March 2014

Proclamation
A Postal Union Alliance
The U.S. Postal Service is under unprecedented attack.  

A (GOP) Congressionally manufactured financial crisis drains the USPS of vital resources. 

Six-day delivery is under constant threat of elimination. The reduction of service standards and the elimination of half of the nation's mail processing centers has slowed service and wiped out tens of thousands of good jobs. 

Post offices in cities and small towns are being sold or closed or having their hours cut back. Corporate privatizers seek to gain control over larger segments of postal operations-and to get their hands on the Postal Service's $65 billion of annual revenue.

The Postmaster General's policies of subcontracting and degrading service are fueling the privatization drive.

The four postal unions stand together to end the attack.
We stand for a public Postal Service, enhancement and expansion of service, and protection of good union jobs in our communities. We stand with the people of our country in defense of their right to a universal postal service operated in the public interest.

We commit to work together to:
• Maintain six-day and home delivery.
• Protect and restore service standards and mail processing facilities.
• Maintain full-time, full-service public post offices in every community.
• Oppose the subcontracting of work and privatization of services.
• Expand postal services to include basic banking, notary, check-cashing and other services.
• End the corporate welfare of excessive pre-sort discounts.
• Form a common front in the fight for genuine postal reform legislation
.• Organize joint actions and speak in a united voice.
• Unite with other labor unions in defense of the rights of postal workers and all workers.
• Encourage joint efforts of our union members at the local level.
• Support maximum cooperation in the next round of contract negotiations.
• Build an alliance with the American people in defense of the public postal service.
We Stand United to 
Protect America's Postal Service
Fredric Rolando, President, National Association of Letter Carriers
Mark Dimonstein, President, American Postal Workers Union
John Hegarty, President, National Postal Mail Handlers Union
Jeanette Dwyer, President, National Rural Letter Carriers Assoc.

 

Friday, February 28, 2014

Ex-Sec'y Labor Starts a Movement

William --

A few years ago, the producers of "Inequality for All" came to me with the idea for a documentary about income inequality. I didn't know how it would turn out but I knew I had to do it.

Last night, I witnessed the culmination of our film's purpose in the passion of thousands of DFA members gathered at more than 700 "Inequality for All" Watch Parties across America. It was an amazing "movement moment" and I was thrilled to be a part of it -- and I know Sen. Elizabeth Warren was as well.

"Inequality for All" revealed how the size and scope of the wealth gap in America is shocking, immoral, and unsustainable. We learned what we are up against, and that's a big first step towards leveling the playing field for working families.

Now, we need to take the next step together and bring this fight to Main Streets everywhere. Through YouPower, Democracy for America's petition platform, you can start petitions to fight for real change on any issue that matters to you -- in just a matter of minutes. That makes it the perfect tool to kick this movement into high gear.

William, will you start a YouPower petition today to raise the minimum wage and help us bring the battle against income inequality to Venice?

Yes, I will start a YouPower petition to raise wages in my city or state.

No, but I will chip in $3 to help other DFA members go on offense against income inequality.


We can't afford to sit on the sidelines any longer. The wealth gap in America is widening by the day, and the threat to our economy and our democracy couldn't be more real or more immediate.

With the Tea Party grinding Washington into gridlock, we can't wait for Congress. Every state can set its own minimum wage and every city can choose to pay its workers more fairly -- if we put on the pressure and make them.

By winning state and local victories in the backyards of Tea Party Republicans and moderate Democrats we can build momentum from the ground up and prove to Washington that this is not an issue that can wait -- it's an issue that can and will decide elections now.

Our fantastic call last night with Sen. Warren was just the first step. Now, let's get to work fighting for fairer wages together. Will you start a YouPower petition right now to raise your local minimum wage?

Yes, I will start a YouPower minimum wage petition campaign today!

No, but I can donate $3 to help other DFA members fight income inequality.
Thank you for joining me in this fight, William. I can't wait to see what we can win working together.

Robert Reich
Former Secretary of Labor

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Herbacides Lower French Sperm Count Dramatically

The French find radical drop in declining sperm quality
THE WORLD | 27/02/2014 at 11:22 • Updated 2/27/2014 

| By Paul Benkimoun
Almost no French region is immune: sperm quality declines. A sharp decline in sperm concentration - almost a third over a period of sixteen years - had already been recognized at national level. This time the phenomenon has been analyzed at the regional level by a joint team of researchers from the Institute of Health Surveillance (VS ) and the National Institute of Health and Medical Research ( Inserm), responsible for database" FIVNAT." 

 Put online Monday, February 24 on the website of the journal Reproduction, their study shows that the trend so widespread, but highlights disparities. Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées have a greater than average decline.
For the authors, these results support the hypothesis of an effect of environmental exposure to endocrine disruptors. These two regions have indeed a strong agricultural and the population is particularly vulnerable to pesticides.
In December 2012, Dr. Joëlle Le Moal InVS and his colleagues published in Human Reproduction the results of a large study involving 26,000 men. They were part of couples who participated in a medically assisted reproduction program ( AMP ) in 126 major metropolitan centers in France between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 2005.
The advantage of this choice was available for each participant. Two semen analyzes, which included information on sperm concentration sperm on their morphology (normal or not) and their motility or their ability to move. Also they included men whose partner was permanently sterile. The researchers justify this criterion that the selected participants had no a priori reason to have a different quality of semen from that of the general male population.
The study showed "significant and continuous reduction in sperm concentration up to 32.2% over the study period." For a man of 35 years, the average concentration increased from 73.6 million sperm per milliliter (ml) of semen 1989-49900000 / ml in 2005. Notably, the authors verified a steady decline by an average of 1.9% per year.
NO INFLUENCE OF GENETIC FACTORS
Similarly, the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology was increased from 60.9 % in 1985 to 39.2% in 2005. Although these data were still far from the levels where you start talking about infertility (below 20 million / ml ), they nevertheless constituted marker of unfavorable.
In the new study, " we took exactly the same sample and compared the dynamics of trends in 21 regions of metropolitan France ," says Dr. Le Moal. The influence of genetic factors can not play strongly over sixteen years, says the researcher. The explanation is therefore more likely to environmental or behavioral factors.
"The ubiquitous nature of the decline is consistent with the effect of environmental factors at work throughout the country," said Dr. Le Moal. However, some areas stand out. Aquitaine has a more pronounced decrease in sperm concentration linear trend. Midi-Pyrénées, which had the lowest average value in 1989, the decline continued and the region still was at last in 2005.
POSITIVE TREND IN Franche-Comté AND BRITAIN
These two regions also showed higher that the whole territory to a decrease in the percentage of morphologically normal sperm trend. Franche-Comté and the UK have experienced the contrary a positive development.
The populations of the two regions where the study highlights significant adverse developments do not have physical characteristics, including their body mass index. These territories are not part of those where rates of tobacco and alcohol are highest. The authors seek more explanation on the side of environmental factors.
As Aquitaine Midi-Pyrénées are highly agricultural: Aquitaine is the first French region for employment in this sector and the second for the number of farms, Midi-Pyrénées is the first region to the number of farms and the second for acreage, say the study authors.
They have a large population may be exposed to products such as pesticides, which can disrupt hormonal functioning . Their viticultural activities" are those where more pesticides in proportion to the agricultural area is used," says Joëlle Le Moal.
"It is very important to monitor the quality of sperm, because it is a sensitive biomarker for environmental exposures and correlated with life expectancy," insists Dr. Le Moal. This is the purpose of human reproductive health and general network environment (whose acronym in English is Hurgent ), launched in December 2013 by InVS at European level.
 

Original French better than Google Translation

Les Français inégaux devant la baisse de la qualité du sperme

LE MONDE | • Mis à jour le | Par
Abonnez-vous
à partir de 1 €
Réagir Classer
Partager google + linkedin pinterest

Quasiment aucune région française n'y échappe : la qualité du sperme décline. Une forte baisse de la concentration de spermatozoïdes – de près d'un tiers sur une période de seize ans – avait déjà été constatée au niveau national. Le phénomène a cette fois été analysé au niveau régional par une équipe réunissant des chercheurs de l'Institut de veille sanitaire (InVS) et de l'Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm), chargés de la base de données « Fivnat ».

Mise en ligne lundi 24 février sur le site de la revue Reproduction, leur étude met en évidence que la tendance n'épargne aucune région, mais souligne des disparités. L'Aquitaine et Midi-Pyrénées présentent un déclin plus marqué que la moyenne.
Pour les auteurs, ces résultats renforcent l'hypothèse d'un effet d'une exposition environnementale à des perturbateurs endocriniens. Ces deux régions ont en effet une forte vocation agricole et la population y est particulièrement exposée aux pesticides.
En décembre 2012, le docteur Joëlle Le Moal de l'InVS et ses collègues avaient publié dans Human Reproduction les résultats d'une Ã©tude de grande ampleur portant sur 26 000 hommes. Ils faisaient partie de couples ayant participé à un programme d'assistance médicale à la procréation (AMP) dans les 126 principaux centres de France métropolitaine, entre le 1er janvier 1989 et le 31 décembre 2005.
Orange - l'apprenti MAGIQUE
Orange - l'apprenti MAGIQUE
On est tous MAGIQUES quand on a autant de pouvoirs à portée de main ! http://www.orange.fr/
L'avantage de ce choix était de disposer pour chacun des participants de deux spermogrammes, ce qui renseignait sur la concentration en spermatozoïdes du sperme, sur leur morphologie (normale ou non) et leur motilité, soit leur aptitude à se déplacer. N'avaient été inclus que les hommes dont la partenaire était définitivement stérile. Les chercheurs justifiaient ce critère par le fait que les participants sélectionnés n'avaient a priori aucune raison d'avoir une qualité de sperme différente de celui de la population masculine générale.
L'étude avait montré « une diminution significative et continue de la concentration du sperme atteignant 32,2 % sur la période étudiée ». Pour un homme de 35 ans, la concentration moyenne passait de 73,6 millions de spermatozoïdes par millilitre (ml) de sperme en 1989 à 49,9 millions/ml en 2005. Fait notable, les auteurs constataient un déclin régulier d'en moyenne 1,9 % par an.
PAS D'INFLUENCE DE FACTEURS GÉNÉTIQUES

De même, le pourcentage de spermatozoïdes ayant une morphologie normale était passé de 60,9 % en 1985 à 39,2 % en 2005. Même si ces données restaient loin des niveaux où l'on commence à parler d'infertilité (en dessous de 20 millions/ml), elles n'en constituaient pas moins le marqueur d'une évolution défavorable.
Dans la nouvelle étude, « nous avons repris exactement le même échantillon et avons comparé la dynamique des tendances dans les 21 régions de France métropolitaine », explique le docteur Le Moal. L'influence de facteurs génétiques ne peut pas jouer fortement sur une période de seize ans, indique la chercheuse. L'explication relève donc plus vraisemblablement de facteurs environnementaux ou comportementaux.
« Le caractère ubiquitaire de la baisse est compatible avec l'effet de facteurs environnementaux à l'oeuvre sur tout le territoire », souligne le docteur Le Moal. Toutefois, certaines régions sortent du lot. L'Aquitaine présente une tendance linéaire plus prononcée à une diminution de la concentration en spermatozoïdes. Pour Midi-Pyrénées, qui avait la valeur moyenne la plus basse en 1989, la baisse s'est poursuivie et la région se situait toujours au dernier rang en 2005.
EVOLUTION POSITIVE EN FRANCHE-COMTÉ ET EN BRETAGNE
Ces deux régions présentaient également une tendance plus marquée que l'ensemble du territoire à une diminution du pourcentage de spermatozoïdes de morphologie normale. La Franche-Comté et la Bretagne ont connu au contraire une évolution positive.
Les populations des deux régions où l'étude met en lumière des évolutions négatives importantes n'ont pas de particularités physiques, notamment pour leur indice de masse corporelle. Ces territoires ne font pas non plus partie de ceux où les taux de consommation de tabac ou d'alcool sont les plus élevés. Les auteurs cherchent plutôt l'explication du côté des facteurs environnementaux.
Aquitaine comme Midi-Pyrénées sont fortement agricoles : l'Aquitaine est la première région française pour l'emploi dans ce secteur et la deuxième pour le nombre d'exploitations ; Midi-Pyrénées est la première région pour le nombre d'exploitations et la deuxième pour la surface cultivée, précisent les auteurs de l'étude.
Elles présentent une population importante susceptible d'être exposée à des produits tels que les pesticides, pouvant perturber le bon fonctionnement hormonal. Leurs activités viticoles « sont celles où l'on utilise le plus de pesticides proportionnellement à la surface agricole », précise Joëlle Le Moal.
« Il est très important de surveiller la qualité du sperme, car c'est un biomarqueur sensible aux expositions environnementales et corrélé à l'espérance de vie », insiste le docteur Le Moal. C'est l'objet du Réseau santé reproductive humaine et environnement général (dont l'acronyme en anglais est Hurgent), lancé en décembre 2013, par l'InVS, à l'échelon européen.

Hollywood Films Risk Lives Unnecessarily

Oscar-Winning DP Haskell Wexler Backs Sarah Jones In Memoriam Campaign, Calls For Safer Sets In Open Letter

By | Wednesday February 26, 2014 @ 5:13pm PST

haskell wexler 

EXCLUSIVE: Two time Academy Award-winning cinematographer Haskell Wexler, ASC today threw his support behind the mounting movement calling for accountability in the on-set death of Midnight Rider crew member Sarah Jones. In a letter sent to fellow members of IATSE Local 600 and obtained by Deadline, Wexler supports efforts to include Jones’s name to Sunday’s Oscars In Memoriam tribute and called her death in Thursday’s train incident an act of “criminal negligence.” Wexler co-founded a group called 12on/12off which advocates a rehaul of current standards that allow for excessively long work hours and questionably safe working conditions on film and TV sets across the industry. In 2006 he directed the documentary Who Needs Sleep? about the dangers crews face in situations in which such health concerns are not prioritized. Read Wexler’s letter:
Related: ‘Midnight Rider’ Suspends Filming Following Train Death
Dear Fellow Workers,
I am part of a group asking that Sarah Jones’ name be included in the Academy’s “In Memoriam” section of the Awards telecast this Sunday. Sarah and the three injured crew members were not victims of an “accident” but of criminal negligence. Something that would not have happened if proper safety rules were in place.
Here is a copy of an ad rejected by our Union magazine, ICG. I was told that the magazine is on, “high alert” on this subject of workplace safety, especially if it comes from me! In this case, the subject comes from the IATSE. They say the magazine doesn’t want to deal with this “political football” even though it is an official IATSE resolution.
midnightriderwexler

Employers will work you longer for less money and under questionable safety conditions because it is their duty to prioritize the bottom line. As individuals we cannot complain. That’s why we need a Union to speak for us, certainly when our safety, our health, and our very lives are at stake! Since they’ve abdicated that responsibility, please join us at 12on12off.
Wear the hat and never forget that as human beings we believe that every person’s health, safety and life is worth more than any film or TV show we can produce.
Take it easy but take it,
Haskell