Friday, November 4, 2011

Partial History of General Strikes

Shutting It All Down:

The Power of General Strikes in U.S. History


BY ERIK LOOMIS

A flyer advertises Occupy Oakland's call for a general strike. (Photo by Flickr userallaboutgeorge, Creative Commons license)

Incredibly threatening to those in power, they rarely succeed. But they do build solidarity.

As protesters gather Wednesday for the general strike called by Occupy Oakland, it's worth looking at the history of this tactic. General strikes are rare in American social movements, because they are difficult to coordinate. On the other hand, few actions offer a more direct challenge to those in power. What can Occupy Oakland learn from their activist ancestors to help its participants draw strength? How have general strikes affected long-term labor and social movements?

The two major general strikes in American history are the Seattle General Strike of 1919 and the Oakland General Strike of 1946. In 1919, the workers of Seattle engaged in a three-day mass action calling all city workers onto the streets. This was the first citywide collective action in American history known as a general strike.

The Pacific Northwest in the early 20th century was a center of radicalism. Horrible working conditions in the timber industry, already radicalized immigrants from Scandinavia, activist dockworkers and the popularity of the Industrial Workers of the World among the region’s thousands of transient workers made Seattle a fertile center of radical thought that even influenced labor organizations affiliated with the traditionally moderate American Federation of Labor (AFL).

The strike began with shipyard workers but was quickly joined by workers around the city. By February 6, over 60,000 workers were on the streets where they remained for four days. In an atmosphere fearful of radicalism after the Bolshevik Revolution, conservatives around the nation declared the strike the first step toward revolution.

Seattle mayor Ole Hanson took the lead in crushing the strike ordering the National Guard to take control of the city’s light company. Fearing long-term fallout, national AFL leaders denounced the strike and it quickly fell apart. After its defeat, the labor movement in Seattle fell apart, a victim of both internal fighting and the vicious Red Scare that followed World War I.

The Oakland General Strike came out of the massive changes to the Bay Area during World War II. Hundreds of thousands of Americans moved to San Francisco, Oakland, Richmond, and other cities to work in wartime industries. The Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) had achieved major successes in organizing American workers during the late 1930s. Often using communist organizers, the CIO built on the militancy of American labor to become a powerful force in opposition to both the more traditional AFL and conservative business interests.

During World War II, the AFL and CIO turned their energies toward defeating the fascist menace of Germany and Japan. The administration of Franklin Roosevelt, wanting to avoid strikes that would undermine wartime production, brought both the AFL and CIO into wartime planning. But while consumer prices rose during the war, wages did not. The motivated and radicalized workers wanted to strike, but their leaders and the federal government urged them to work through it.

When the war ended however, the country was overtaken by a wave of strikes. In 1946, 4.5 million workers went on strike throughout the United States, the greatest number of strikers in one year in American history. Wages did not keep up with rapidly rising prices and higher wages were the core demand of almost all the strikers.

The situation in Oakland was especially volatile because of the city’s Retail Merchants Association, a powerful and deeply anti-union business organization. These department stores owners employed mostly women, who they believed would accept low wages. The Department and Specialty Store Employees Union Local 1265 organized workers at these downtown stores. Early in 1946, they won victories at smaller stores and decided to take on the biggest retailers, Kahn’s and Hastings. A month-long strike ensued in the late fall of 1946. Beginning mere blocks from Occupy Oakland’s encampment, this turned into one of the biggest challenges to corporate America in the postwar years.

Although the CIO had the more radical agenda, it was actually the AFL who decided to call for a general strike on December 2, 1946 in support of the striking department store workers. AFL workers around Oakland walked off their jobs—bus drivers, teamsters, sailors, machinists, cannery workers, railroad porters, waiters, waitresses, cooks. For over two days, Oakland shut down. Over 100,000 workers participated in the strike.

The strikers controlled Oakland. All businesses except for pharmacies and food markets shut down. Bars could stay open but could only serve beer and had to put their juke boxes outside and allow for their free use. Couples literally danced in the streets. Recently returned war veterans created squadrons to prepare for battle. Union leadership took a back seat to rank and file actions.

Although it is often spun in Oakland legend that the General Strike was a successful action, it really wasn’t. A majority of workers wanted to continue striking and CIO unions considered joining in support, but the strike fell apart because of a single corrupt labor leader. Dave Beck, the head of the Teamsters and Jimmy Hoffa’s mentor, forced a compromise when he pulled his powerful union off the lines and endorsed a moderate settlement that accomplished almost nothing and quite literally did not address the department store workers concerns at all. While the still agitated workers managed to elect several labor representatives to the city council, the entire apparatus of the city used the General Strike to attack all labor. The police, the city government, and the Oakland Tribune combined to resist not only the Unionization of the department stores, but all Labor in Oakland.

While Oakland remained a strong Union city after this, the strikes of 1946 around the nation and especially the Oakland General Strike led to the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947. Taft-Hartley was an open attack on the labor movement, limiting labor’s ability to strike, banning sympathy strikes (which could make it legally difficult for today’s unions to support Occupy Oakland’s General Strike), and allow individual states to pass so-called “right to work” laws, meaning that just because there is a Union at your workplace doesn’t mean you have to join it.

Soon after, the McCarthy era began and radical Unionism of any kind became suspicious, with the CIO kicking the Communist organizers and entire Communist-led unions out of the Federation, turning its back on its radical history.

If there is one lesson to take from these general strikes, it’s that they are extremely threatening to those in power. If successful, they show that the 1% have lost the control they so ardently seek. They will react with ferocity against the organizers, laying bare structural and legal inequalities in this nation. Neither strike was successful, but we remember them as moments of incredible worker solidarity when it seemed massive changes were about to happen. They need to be seen as part of the larger struggles of working people to achieve basic rights, decent wages, and safe living conditions in this country.

The Occupy Wall Street movement is picking up this torch and providing a strong voice for those who have become disempowered in the unregulated capitalism of the early 21st century. Whether the new general strike succeeds or not is less important than the public stand it takes against the exploitation of working-class people. The general strike is not the end of the road but rather one step on the path to taking back our country.

Finally, I want to encourage everyone involved in the Occupy movement, as well as anyone who identifies as progressive, to deeply read labor history and the history of social movements. Knowing about your ancestors is great, but the past offers a more direct lesson: understanding how various tactics and strategies have worked in the past, and how they can work in the present.




Financial Tax Protest by Unions

Unions, Occupy Wall Street to protest outside Treasury for ‘Robin Hood’ tax-Push For Franchise Tax (F.T.T.)


Pivoting off the Occupy Wall Street movement, unions are planning coordinated protests Thursday for a financial transactions tax (F.T.T.).

Organizers estimate more than 1,500 union members from more than 20 Labor groups, including the AFL-CIO, the American Federation of County, State and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and the Communications Workers of America (CWA), will be outside the Treasury Department Thursday to call for what has become known as the “Robin Hood Tax.”

Occupy Wall Street protesters also are being bused in from New York by National Nurses United (NNU) — yet another example of the evolving relationship between Labor and the protesters that have targeted the financial sector.

Karen Higgins, co-president of the NNU, told The Hill that instituting a financial transactions tax could help fund social programs that are under threat.

“This is actually the first step to do something concrete and beneficial and not harm others by taking money out of social programs that help people survive,” Higgins said. “It is only reasonable that Wall Street contributes its fair share.”

The protest outside Treasury will be one of many planned for Thursday.

Union members, including AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, will be in Cannes, France, to call for the tax at the opening of the G-20 Summit that will be attended by President Obama and other world leaders.

There are also protests planned for Los Angeles (November 5th) and San Francisco.

Labor leaders have adopted the rhetoric of the protest movement, citing how the 99 percent of the country have suffered at the hands of the wealthiest 1 percent. Unions have provided logistical support for the protesters as well.

NNU members have set up first aid stations in several cities, including at Wall Street, to help the protesters. CWA members marched with protesters to a Verizon wireless store in New York last month. And one of AFSCME’s local Wisconsin unions helped provide pizzas for the protesters.

The protests come as Labor has grown frustrated with a proposal by Democratic members of the Super Committee — the panel tasked with reducing the federal deficit by at least $1.2 trillion. The Democrats’ plan would reduce the deficit by $3 trillion — partly through $500 billion in cuts to entitlement programs — and would include $1.3 trillion in tax hikes and Obama’s $447 billion jobs bill.

Higgins and others in Labor have long been calling for a financial transactions tax (F.T.T.) to help provide government funds for social programs. In September, the AFL-CIO drafted a memo that said a financial transactions tax could bring in $1 trillion in new government revenue over the 10 years.

Higgins said Lawmakers are targeting the wrong things to bring down the debt.

“Again, it is still going back to programs that we should not touch during a time of crisis, and this is a time of crisis,” Higgins said. “We need to be very disturbed about what suggestions are being made.”

Thursday, November 3, 2011

GENERAL STRIKE OAKLAND

Occupy Oakland General Strike

Shuts Down Port of Oakland


Occupy Oakland Calls For General Strike

OAKLAND (CBS SF) — Many Occupy Oakland protesters Wednesday evening
returned to Frank Ogawa Plaza after demonstrating at the Port of Oakland,
forcing the Port to shut down operations.

Port officials said Wednesday night’s protest was peaceful and no injuries or property damage were reported.

Port Executive Director Omar Benjamin said maritime operations will only

resume “when it is safe and secure to do so.”

Ben Bruso, 23, a direct service provider for developmentally disabled individuals, was one of hundreds who blocked the Port’s Gate One, where the demonstration has a party-like feel, complete with a brass band.

Bruso said he was there because he wants to get rid of lobbying in government.

“Our government is being bought by corporations,” said Bruso, a Service Employees International Union member, who came to the march of his own accord.

“The middle class and lower class are being subjugated,” he said.

Related Coverage:
Banks Targeted In Marches, Rallies In General Strike
Photo Gallery: Occupy Oakland General Strike

On the closure of the Port, Bruso said, “Obviously it sends a message to the corporate world that we’re not going to sit by and take it anymore.”

Colin Holtzinger, 24, a mental health counselor, said he was at the Port because he believes “we need to tax the rich and get rid of the barriers of entry to small businesses.”

Holtzinger also said, “I feel great. This is the largest movement I’ve seen in my lifetime.”

A group of several hundred demonstrators gathered to block entrances to the Port at Maritime and Seventh streets.

KCBS Team Coverage Of Occupy Oakland General Strike:

“I support the Occupy movement and the 99 percent. The priorities of this country need to be re-examined and re-ordered,” said Marti Mogensen, 63, a teacher at Berkeley High School.

Mogensen was formerly a teacher in the small town of Onalaska, Wis., the town where Scott Olsen, is from—Olsen is a former marine who was injured in last week’s demonstration.

“I think his case is interesting because it’s done a lot to move Occupy Oakland into international attention. I really think it’s tragic,” she said.

She said some of the teachers at Berkeley High School did “teach-ins” Wednesday to support the general strike.

On closing the Port, Mogrensen said, “I think it really shows that people want change and they want to organize and these tactics do work.”

Jessica Hendricks, 27, a chair of the Berkeley chapter of the ACLU, said, “I’m here exercising my freedom of speech and making sure the rest can do so peacefully.”

On closing the Port she said, “I think it shows the strength and power of the people.”

The group at Maritime and Seventh streets had blocked trucks from entering and exiting the Port all night and the numbers appear to be growing.

Trucks that tried to exit with cargo were forced to turn around. However, drivers who attempted to leave without cargo are allowed to pass.

Monday, October 24, 2011

L.A. PROGRESSIVES REBEL - OCTOBER


OCT. 1 OCCUPATION LOS ANGELES – LA CITY HALL LAWN 250 rebels

Occupy Wall St in LA, 99% vs. 1%; Young, leaderless.


OCT. 7 ICUJP, US Labor Against the War, Inter Faith Coalition

Fund Jobs, Stop Torture, End All US Wars 200 rebels

La Placita Church to downtown Federal Building Leaders arrested


LA ANSWER PROTEST Against 5 Global Wars (US Imperialism)

Westwood / Wilshire Federal Building unkn #


SM Peace Club, Progressive Democratic Workers 50 Bike rebels

“We - are - The - 99%” and “Tax Wall Street” - Night riders rally

SM Pier to Abbot Kinney, Venice for Friday Street Fair


OCT. 13 MOVE ON, PDWA, SMPeaceClub Rally at BofA 250 rebels

Banksters “Pay Your Taxes” “Foreclosure Moratorium Now”


OCT. 15 MOVE ON, JOBS-NOT-CUTS.org Sat. National Action 3000 rebels

950 cities nationwide Rally for JOBS-NOT-CUTS; MOVE ON

LA Pershing Square to Rally at Occupy LA, City Hall, SATURDAY


OCT. 19 SEIU, long term care, AFL CIO Unions, GoodJobsLA.org

99 % vs 1%, “Stop Cuts to Grammas”, Latino and AA 1000 rebels

“Hey, hey. Ho, ho. Corporate Greed's Gotta Go”

Pershing Square to Occupy LA, City Hall North and South lawns


OCT. 21 FAUX-NEWS-LIES PROTEST (first), Pico Blvd. Studios 200 rebels

GoodJobsLA.org, ChangeToWin, FreePress, AVAAP.org

50 rebels from Occupy LA. “Fox News Lies”, “Murdoch

hacked terror victim = Felony”, “Fox brainwashed my baby”


OCT. 22 200 US Cities OCCUPIED – 1000 Cities World Wide OCCUPIED

W.L.A. Santa Monica MOVE ON's Upcoming Local-National Actions

NOV. 5 MAKE BANKS PAY Rally at Chase Foreclosures, Westwood / Wilshire

NOV. 9 NATIONAL TEACH-IN; Banks caused Crash; must pay to rehire America

NOV. 19 Wall St/Fox/GOP TV , Pico Blvd at Motor (parking lot in Rancho Pk)

Contact MoveOn's Elizabeth / Linda at Blueprl@yahoo.com

Or Bill at PDWAmerica @ gmail.com – MoveOn + Unions + Peace orgs

Friday, October 21, 2011

Wildcat Strikes vs Alabama Laws

Alabama Workers Meet Harsh Immigration Law with WildcatsEduardo Soriano-Castillo | October 21, 2011

Tens of thousands of protesters marched through downtown Atlanta July 2 to protest an anti-immigrant law. Georgia's was one of four bills passed this year that are creating fear in immigrant communities, driving people out of state, and leaving crops rotting in the fields. Photo: Caitie Leary. Login or register to post comments
An all-out attack on immigrant workers, their families, and communities continues in the South and West. In Alabama, immigrant workers met it with a day of wildcat strikes.

The now-infamous Arizona anti-immigrant law SB1070 kicked off the current wave of anti-immigrant legislation last year. This year Georgia, Utah, South Carolina, and Alabama jumped on the “show me your papers” bandwagon with copycat legislation.

Immigrant rights advocates say Alabama’s law is the harshest. It gives police the right to stop and investigate anyone they “reasonably suspect” of being undocumented—in other words, an open invitation to racially profile.

The legislation also denies immigrants state medical aid and unemployment benefits. It forbids individuals and employers to hire, harbor, rent property to, or even give a ride to undocumented immigrants. Public schools must check the immigration status of children when they enroll.

One town, Allgood, announced that all water customers must have a state picture ID on file or “you may lose water service.”

ON HOLD
Most of Alabama’s law, and the other states’ laws, are on hold pending Department of Justice challenges. The government has argued that these state laws are unconstitutional because immigration is a federal matter.

The anti-immigrant laws come as federal initiatives have driven deportations to an all-time high. A partnership between local law enforcement agencies and the federal immigration service (ICE), known as Secure Communities, has led to the deportation of a record 400,000 undocumented immigrants in 2011. They can be deported for any crime, no matter how small or nonviolent.

Dulce Guerrero, a DREAM activist and 18-year-old high school graduate from Mableton, Georgia, said three of her uncles have been deported after being stopped “for things like speeding and broken tail lights.”

Legislators’ strategy is to make conditions so unbearable for immigrant workers that they flee the country. But cruelty hasn’t led to out-migration. For many reasons, including a dangerously militarized border, the undocumented population has stayed in the U.S.—even as workers have fled to more welcoming states.

Workers, students, and small business owners in Alabama gave lawmakers a taste of what society would look like without them.

They led a “Day Without Immigrants” action October 12 that involved student walkouts and wildcat strikes, shuttering at least 40 businesses and slowing operations in half a dozen poultry plants.

SHUT IT DOWN
More than 2,000 mostly undocumented workers shut down the processing lines and butchering room floors in Albertville, in the state’s northeast corner.

Although a majority of the poultry plant workers are Latinos, a few white and Black workers also came off the line for the day in a show of solidarity with immigrant workers, said José Contreras, a Dominican immigrant. He’s the owner of a small grocery store and restaurant in Albertville who shut down his business for the day.

Plants closed included Diamond Food, Tyson, and Wayne Farms, which is a union shop.

Rick Major, secretary-treasurer of Food and Commercial Workers Local 1995, said “We had many members calling in to work and saying that they needed to pick up their children at school because of fears associated with the law.”

ONE STEP FORWARD
In a victory for undocumented students, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill October 8 that allows them to apply for California grants and state financial aid.

An earlier bill allowed such students to get financial aid from private sources. The two laws are the state’s equivalent of the federal DREAM Act that students have been advocating for two years—often risking arrest to publicize their plight, declaring themselves “undocumented and unafraid.”

Despite a new federal policy supposedly giving judges the ability to cancel deportations on a case-by-case basis, DREAM activists have recently faced a wave of deportations.

Major said the climate of fear is pervasive. Children are bullying Latino students, telling them, “They are going to come for your mom and deport her.”

School districts are reporting a sudden exodus of children, pulled from school by their parents, who fear retaliation or immigration agents coming to their front steps.

But the union didn’t back the October 12 strike.

“We could not support the wildcat action because our members have a no-strike clause in their contract,” Major said. “As the union, our concerns are upholding and enforcing the contract between the workers and the employer.”

Some unionists in the state were supportive. “Immigrants in Alabama are rightfully scared, and the whole time the boss is enjoying the benefits of a divided workforce that's working under the fear of deportation,” said Mark Bass, president of Longshore (ILA) Local 1410 in Mobile.

Contreras said that 40 business owners, including auto repair shop mechanics, car dealers, and restaurant owners all shut down in solidarity.

“Our goal was to illustrate the economic and social contributions of immigrant workers,” he said.

Elia Ortega Arista, a DJ at the Spanish-language radio station Doble X in Albertville, said a shutdown instead of a march was chosen because “community members are being terrorized and are understandably afraid of any confrontation with local authorities.”

Conversations at the grocery store, on Facebook, and on local radio stations helped organize the statewide shutdowns and walkouts.

Direct action is not new to Albertville. Five thousand supporters of immigration reform mobilized in 2006 for a mass strike, part of immigrant rights protests and walkouts nationwide.

“We asked that supporters do zero business and buy nothing,” Contreras said. “After seeing the economic devastation left behind in states like Arizona and Georgia, we thought it would be a useful illustration of what’s to come if Alabama lawmakers continue on this dangerous and self-destructive path.”

ROTTING IN THE FIELDS
Farmworkers, their families, and tax dollars have fled harshly anti-immigrant states like Arizona and Georgia in search of friendlier states, so farm owners have turned to probationers and prisoners on work-release programs to fill the void.

But those workers have been unable to keep up with the requirements of these backbreaking jobs, many quitting after just hours in the sun and leaving farm owners to watch their crops rot in the fields.

In the process, they dispel the myth that immigrants are “stealing our jobs,” confirming that citizens are simply not interested in such exhausting and low-wage work.

Fox News Latino reported that on one Georgia cucumber farm, some Mexican and Guatemalan laborers were accustomed to filling 200 buckets before lunch, bucking for incentive pay. The fastest probationer filled only 134 buckets in a day.

DON’T SPARE WOMEN AND CHILDREN
Other immigrant workers are not as visible but equally important to performing the services middle-class Americans depend on.

They include the women workers who work inside their bosses’ homes. Domestic workers clean the houses, fold the clothes, prepare the meals, and take care of children and the elderly, for low wages and with no legal protections against wage theft or forced overtime, sometimes facing sexual harassment or worse.

They share with other immigrants the attack on their communities by politicians looking to make a name for themselves.

A diverse group from two dozen human rights organizations around the country—calling itself the We Belong Together Delegation—visited Georgia in September to document the impact of that state’s anti-immigrant law.

Women told of being afraid to report sexual harassment or wage theft to authorities for fear of being deported. They described choosing to stay with an abusive partner rather than report domestic violence and risk deportation and separation from their children. Many go without basic health care for fear of coming into view of law enforcement.

“It’s important that we highlight the issues which uniquely affect women and children,” said Linda Burnham with the National Domestic Workers Alliance.

As immigrants wage the uphill battle to reclaim the most basic of human rights, they too are among the 99 percent

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

FOX WIRETAPPING SCANDAL

Phone hacking: QC warned of

'culture of illegal information access'

at Fox's 'News of the World'

    Tom Crone

    Phone hacking: News of the World lawyer Tom Crone warned editor Colin Myler of about a 'damning email' in 2008. Photograph: PA

    This afternoon's events as they unfolded:

    2.30pm: The parliamentary select committee investigating phone-hacking at the News of the World has just published a slew of internal News International documents.

    They represent a treasure trove of new material and give fresh insight into how the News of the World, its editors and legal managers and ultimate boss, James Murdoch, handled serious phone-hacking allegations back in 2008.

    There are dozens of pages including notes relating to key conversations with Murdoch regarding a settlement with Gordon Taylor, the Professional Footballers Association boss who sued News International back in 2008 for phone hacking.

    We are going through the documents now.

    2.34pm: First up is an admission that Taylor has potential "fatal" evidence on phone hacking at the News of the World.

    It is contained in an email from the paper's former legal manager to the former editor of the News of the World Colin Myler in May 2008 regarding the discovery by Taylor of "a large number of transcripts of voicemails" from his phone.

    The email also raises concerns about alleged illegal activity on the News of the World including the identification of car owners via their number plates. A number of the people involved have moved to the Sun, Crone notes.

    Among the documents Taylor's lawyers got through a process of discovery were a list of News of the World journalists and detailed table of data protection infringements between 2001 and 2003.

    "A number of these names are still with us and some of them have moved to prominent positions on NoW and The Sun. Typical infringements are 'turning around' car reg and mobile phone numbers (illegal)," says the email.

    It adds: "This evidence, particularly the email from the News of the World is fatal to our case."

    2.44pm: In the same email Crone tells Myler that "recognising the inevitable", he has authorised the company's solicitors Farrers, to make a formal offer to Taylor of £150k plus costs.

    2.47pm: An hour and 15 minutes after this email, Crone emails Julian Pike, the lawyer dealing with the Taylor case at Farrers.

    The email is redacted but Crone tells Pike he has been through the Taylor documents and spoke to individuals at the News of the World regarding the transcripts and that that the private investigator [Glenn] "Mulcaire had been dealing with Greg Miskiw for months on it before that.

    Miskiw is a former news editor on the paper.

    2.59pm: James Murdoch's solution to phone hacking at the News of the World would be to "get rid of the cancer", the former editor of the paper tells Farrer lawyer Julian Pike in a telephone call on May 27 2008.

    A handwritten note of the phone conversation shows that Myler reported back to Pike.

    "Spoke to James Murdoch - not any options - wait for silks [sic] view." Myler goes on to discuss various individuals in the newsroom which are identified by initials. He refers to former royal editor Clive Goodman.

    "CG sprayed around allegations, horrid process."

    This appears to refer to a Goodman letter, already published by the culture select committee, in which he alleged phone hacking was not limited to a single rogue reporter.

    Colin Myler Former News of the World editor Colin Myler. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images

    Myler tells Pike he could not substantiate these allegations.

    "appealed agst his sacking failed to give direct evidence."

    The hand-written note show Myler then went on to discuss what top management would do and refers to Les Hinton, the former executive chairman of News International who had been sent to New York to run the Wall Street Journal, then recently acquired by Rupert Murdoch.

    "Les no longer here - James wld say get rid of them - cut out cancer'.

    The note does not specify who 'them' refers to, or whether this was a verbatim report of a conversation Myler had with Murdoch earlier.

    He has just had a conversation with James Murdoch and subsequently spoke to lawyers at Farrers.

    A hand-written note of a conversation lawyer Julian Pike had with Myler on 27 May 2008 has also been published.

    3.13pm: Another handwritten note of a conversation between Pike and Mark Lewis, Taylor's solicitor. They were discussing a potential settlement after Taylor had got hold of the highly damaging 'for Neville' email that proved phone hacking at the tabloid was not confined to "one rogue reporter".

    A figure of £1.2m is discussed, according to the notes.

    Taylor wanted "7 figures not to open his mouth". The Football Professionals Association boss also wanted to "be vindicated or rich", the note says, confirming evidence submitted in September to the select committee.

    3.20pm: The two lawyers go on to discuss costs and Taylor's determination to go to court if he has to. "One way or another this is going to hurt," Lewis tells Pike, also warning that phone hacking was "rife in organisation".

    This is the transcript of what Lewis said:

    "Don't know if that is a [indecipherable'
    7 figures not to open his mouth
    be vindicated or rich
    paid £1m all costs - indemnity costs 200k inc barrister + VAT he [Taylor] won't be beat

    "advised not be casual not at risk an more - j might think been generous

    "i want to carry on because of issues because NGN is wrong then carry on - one way or another this is going to hurt

    "want to show NoW stories - NoW doing this - rife in organisation - Palt enquiries told this not happening when it was. I want to speak out about this."

    3.35pm: The telephone conversation between News International's lawyers and Gordon Taylor's lawyers subsequently relayed to New Group Newspapers, publishers of the News of the World.

    Gordon Taylor PFA boss Gordon Taylor. Photograph: Tom Jenkins/Guardian

    The memo published by the select committee shows how Taylor was driven to seek £1m in compensation plus £200,000 in costs because he was not happy that the company was telling parliament that phone-hacking was limited to one rogue reporter.

    "Taylor wanted to show that the News of the World stories had been illegally obtained".

    "He wanted to demonstrate that the NoW had been doing this and that it was rife in the organisation when The NoW had been making public statements including statements in parliament telling them that they [sic] were simply a rogue trader. Taylor was not happy about this. He wanted to speak out about all of this."

    3.47pm: Farrer partner Julian Pike has a subsequent conversation with the then News of the World legal affairs manager Tom Crone on June 10, 2008.

    Crone tells Pike he has had a meeting with JM - presumably James Murdoch - and CM - presumably the then editor Colin Myler.

    The note of the conversation is confusing but two points are clear - Murdoch wants to consider his options and Myler wants to Taylor to "fuck off".

    Here's the transcript:

    "Tom
    Mtg with JM + CM
    JM sd he wanted to think through options

    CM moving towards to tell Taylor to fuck off
    - on the end of drip drip - do a deal with them
    - paying them off + then silence fails
    - if intriguing progress

    GM in more deeply - if damages award admitting liability - be in jointly for + if he is."

    4.01pm:News Group was advised by legal counsel as far back as June 2008 that the evidence uncovered by Taylor's legal team was "very damaging to NGN" and that the police disclosures showed that "at least three" journalists were "intimately involved" in illegal research.

    Barrister Michael Silverleaf said in a written legal opinion to NGN dated 3 June 2008, that "it seems clear that Mr Mulcaire was specifically asked to look into certain activities by Mr Taylor".

    Silverleaf says the material obtained from the Metropolitan police "has disclosed that at least three NGN journalists ... appear to haver been intimately involved in Mr Mulcaire's illegal researching into Mr Taylor's affairs."

    He refers to a document dated 4 February 2005, and signed by Greg Miskiw, a former news editor on the paper which agrees to pay a Paul Williams £7,000 on publication of a story.

    Williams is a pseudonym used by the private investigator at the centre of the phone-hacking scandal, Glenn Mulcaire.

    4.23pm: News Group was also advised by Silverleaf that there was nothing that could "possibly justify the use of unlawful means to obtain information" about the Taylor story.

    He advises them that the prospects of winning against Taylor in a breach of confidence and invasion of privacy case are "slim" to "non-existent".

    4.28pm: Silverleaf told News Group that it was "vicariously liable for the conduct of its employees unless they were acting on a frolic of their own".

    If you are wondering why the expression "vicariously liable" seems familiar, it's because the phrase was used by James Murdoch in a letter to the select committee last week.

    In the letter Murdoch admitted that News International will have to pay any damages awarded against the private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, in instances where it is proven he was instructed to hack phones by News of the World staff.

    4.29pm: Silverleaf does not pull his punches.

    He says there is a "powerful case" that there was a culture of "illegal information access" at the paper and if this came out in court it would be "extremely damaging to NGN's public reputation".

    Paragraph 6 of his legal opinion to NGN in June 2008 says:

    "There is overwhelming evidence of the involvement of senior NGN journalists in the illegal enquiries into ...[redacted]."

    "In addition there is substantial surrounding material about the extent of NGN's journalists' attempts to obtain information access to information illegally in relation to other individuals.

    "In light of these facts there is a powerful case that there is (or was) a culture of illegal information access used at NGN in order to produce stories for publication.

    "Not only does this mean that NGN is virtually certain to be held liable to Mr Taylor, to have this paraded at a public trial, would I imagine, be extremely damaging to NGN's public reputation."

    5.06pm: John Whittingdale, chairman of the select committee says the documents are proof that senior managers at News of the World were aware "for a long time" of evidence that phone hacking was widespread at the tabloid.

    "This contradicts the evidence given to us previously and we shall be asking about this when James Murdoch comes before the committee," he said.

    A summary of the day's events:

    • News International was advised by legal counsel as far back as 2008 that there was "overwhelming evidence" that at "a number of senior journalists" at the News of the World were involved in phone-hacking.

    • Michael Silverleaf, QC, told the publisher there was "a powerful case" that a "culture of illegal information access" existed on the paper and this would be "extremely damaging" to the "company's public reputation" if this got out in a court case.

    • The News of the World's chief lawyer Tom Crone privately told the paper's editor as long ago as 2008 that a "damning email" existed showing that the tabloid made use of "extremely private voicemails" left on the telephone of football boss Gordon Taylor in 2008

    • Taylor's lawyers had obtained evidence that "at least three journalists" on the paper were "intimately involved" in Glenn Mulcaire's illegal researching.

    • Crone described the evidence as "fatal to our case" in a memo to ex editor Colin Myler ahead of a meeting with James Murdoch to discuss whether to settle Taylor's claim. He said the company's position was "perilous".

    .
    • This article was amended on 2 November 2011 to remove an incorrect reference to former News International chief operating officer Clive Milner in the 3.47pm update. The "CM" referred to was presumably News of the World editor Colin Myler.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Labor Supports Occupy Wall St.and LA

AFL-CIO Summit Supports
Occupy Wall Street Protests
by Donna Jablonski, Oct 2, 2011

The 800 young workers, activists and students at the AFL-CIO Next Up Young Worker Summit in Minneapolis announced their strong support of the Occupy Wall Street protesters:

”The world in which we live isn’t working for the vast majority of people. The top 1 percent controls the economy, makes profits at the expense of working people, and dominates the political debate. Wall Street symbolizes this simple truth: a small group of people have the lives and livelihoods of working Americans in their hands.

“In the last two weeks, young people have sparked a movement on Wall Street, just as they did through the Arab Spring and in Wisconsin against Scott Walker. Participants at the AFL-CIO Next Up Young Worker Summit left Occupy Wall Street to join with young people in the labor movement to talk about how best to take back our economy for the middle class.

“Today, more than 800 Next Up participants from around the country stand with those on Wall Street who are making their voices heard. The future of our country depends on young people demanding the future we believe in.

And we believe that Wall Street should pay for the damage they’ve done to our economy, our jobs, and our communities – foreclosing on homes, making massive profits with no oversight, and not sharing in building a future for the next generation.

“We stand together in calling for a country that doesn’t just work for the top 1 percent. We stand together to call for a sustainable future that doesn’t begin with massive tax breaks for the wealthy and end with austerity measures and a jobs crisis.

“We are one."