Wednesday, November 14, 2012

General Strike Today in Europe


Steve Zeltzer
9:15 AM (27 minutes ago)
to undisclosed recipients

Workers in Southern Europe Synchronize Anti-Austerity Strikes

Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Demonstrators marched during a protest in Rome on Wednesday.
By 
Published: November 14, 2012
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
MADRID — For the first time since the start of the euro crisis, labor unrest took on a European dimension on Wednesday as Spanish and Portuguese workers coordinated a general strike while unions inGreece and Italy also planned protests and work stoppages.
World Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
David Ramos/Getty Images
Demonstrators set up a barricade in Barcelona on Wednesday.
Jose Coelho/European Pressphoto Agency
A train in Porto, Portugal, on Wednesday morning was empty.
Spain’s heavy industry and large parts of the transportation network were disrupted early on Wednesday by the second general strike since the Popular Party of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy came to power last December.
The Spanish strike was called by unions after Mr. Rajoy presented a tough austerity budget for next year but it also comes after the country’s jobless rate recently reached a record 25 percent. Portugal faces a similar situation of soaring unemployment and budget cuts to comply with the terms of a $100 billion bailout agreement reached last year with international creditors.
Early on Wednesday, Spanish police reported that 32 people had been arrested and 15 injured – including five policemen — during violence on picket lines across the country but the government said the strike had so far not led to major disturbances. Many shops, banks and retailers were open for business.
While about 700 flights in and out of Spain were canceled Wednesday, Madrid and other airports were still functioning. The strike coincided with growing uncertainty about the future of Iberia, the national airline, after management announced this month that the airline needed to lay off a quarter of its workers to survive.
Ignacio Fernández Toxo, the head of one of Spain’s two main unions, Comisiones Obreras, said that the coordinated strike action across the Iberian Peninsula, as well as work stoppages in other parts of Europe, amounted to “a historic moment in the European Union movement.”
However, support for trade unions has dwindled in recent years because of their failure to prevent the surge in unemployment and controversy surrounding the unions’ reliance on government subsidies rather than contributions from members. In Spain, only about 16 percent of workers are unionized.
In fact, the strike could be overshadowed by protests in Madrid and other cities scheduled for late afternoon.
“I can afford to protest but not to lose a day of pay,” said Carlos Sánchez, a mechanic at Disancar, a small Madrid garage. “Striking at this stage in the crisis brings absolutely nothing to the workers.”
Still, the strike severely disrupted production across the Spanish automotive sector, with workers staying away from factories owned by Nissan, Volkswagen and other carmakers.
In Italy, civil servants went on strike and national transportation workers – although not airlines — called for a four-hour halt on Wednesday afternoon. Students demonstrated throughout the country, with rallies in Turin and Rome.
In Greece, the scene of the most violent social unrest in Europe since the start of the debt crisis, unions called a three-hour work stoppage starting at noon.
Union workers elsewhere also staged a number of protests and stoppages as a show of solidarity with their southern European counterparts.
A walkout by Belgian rail workers severely disrupted services on the country's Thalys high-speed rail line and halted all its connections to Germany, the rail company said Wednesday.
More than 130 demonstrations were planned across France, with two of the country's biggest unions — the Confédération Générale du Travail, or CGT, and the Confédération Française Democratique du Travail, or CFDT — organizing a joint march through the streets of Paris, the first such protests since President François Hollande took office in May.
In a joint statement, five leading French unions expressed their "strong opposition to these austerity measures that are plunging Europe into economic stagnation and recession" and "threaten the European social model."
Spanish unions disagreed with the government and employers over the impact of the strike Wednesday morning. While Mr. Toxo and other union leaders called the strike a success, Juan Rosell, the chairman of the main employers’ organization said that the walkouts appeared to be “not very important” and most likely less disruptive of the last general strike in March, based on electricity data and other early indicators. Red Eléctrica, operator of the national electricity grid, said that consumption was down 18.6 percent at 8 a.m. compared to a normal working day.
Nonetheless, Mr. Rosell called the decision to strike “a torpedo against recovery.”
Indeed, it comes as Mr. Rajoy is struggling to convince investors that Madrid will not require further European rescue funding and will meet budget deficit targets agreed with its European counterparts, in spite of a deepening recession.
In Valencia, a group of strikers tried to block access to the main office of Bankia, a giant lender 
Steve Zeltzer
9:15 AM (27 minutes ago)
to undisclosed recipients

Workers in Southern Europe Synchronize Anti-Austerity Strikes

Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Demonstrators marched during a protest in Rome on Wednesday.
By 
Published: November 14, 2012
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
MADRID — For the first time since the start of the euro crisis, labor unrest took on a European dimension on Wednesday as Spanish and Portuguese workers coordinated a general strike while unions inGreece and Italy also planned protests and work stoppages.
World Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
David Ramos/Getty Images
Demonstrators set up a barricade in Barcelona on Wednesday.
Jose Coelho/European Pressphoto Agency
A train in Porto, Portugal, on Wednesday morning was empty.
Spain’s heavy industry and large parts of the transportation network were disrupted early on Wednesday by the second general strike since the Popular Party of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy came to power last December.
The Spanish strike was called by unions after Mr. Rajoy presented a tough austerity budget for next year but it also comes after the country’s jobless rate recently reached a record 25 percent. Portugal faces a similar situation of soaring unemployment and budget cuts to comply with the terms of a $100 billion bailout agreement reached last year with international creditors.
Early on Wednesday, Spanish police reported that 32 people had been arrested and 15 injured – including five policemen — during violence on picket lines across the country but the government said the strike had so far not led to major disturbances. Many shops, banks and retailers were open for business.
While about 700 flights in and out of Spain were canceled Wednesday, Madrid and other airports were still functioning. The strike coincided with growing uncertainty about the future of Iberia, the national airline, after management announced this month that the airline needed to lay off a quarter of its workers to survive.
Ignacio Fernández Toxo, the head of one of Spain’s two main unions, Comisiones Obreras, said that the coordinated strike action across the Iberian Peninsula, as well as work stoppages in other parts of Europe, amounted to “a historic moment in the European Union movement.”
However, support for trade unions has dwindled in recent years because of their failure to prevent the surge in unemployment and controversy surrounding the unions’ reliance on government subsidies rather than contributions from members. In Spain, only about 16 percent of workers are unionized.
In fact, the strike could be overshadowed by protests in Madrid and other cities scheduled for late afternoon.
“I can afford to protest but not to lose a day of pay,” said Carlos Sánchez, a mechanic at Disancar, a small Madrid garage. “Striking at this stage in the crisis brings absolutely nothing to the workers.”
Still, the strike severely disrupted production across the Spanish automotive sector, with workers staying away from factories owned by Nissan, Volkswagen and other carmakers.
In Italy, civil servants went on strike and national transportation workers – although not airlines — called for a four-hour halt on Wednesday afternoon. Students demonstrated throughout the country, with rallies in Turin and Rome.
In Greece, the scene of the most violent social unrest in Europe since the start of the debt crisis, unions called a three-hour work stoppage starting at noon.
Union workers elsewhere also staged a number of protests and stoppages as a show of solidarity with their southern European counterparts.
A walkout by Belgian rail workers severely disrupted services on the country's Thalys high-speed rail line and halted all its connections to Germany, the rail company said Wednesday.
More than 130 demonstrations were planned across France, with two of the country's biggest unions — the Confédération Générale du Travail, or CGT, and the Confédération Française Democratique du Travail, or CFDT — organizing a joint march through the streets of Paris, the first such protests since President François Hollande took office in May.
In a joint statement, five leading French unions expressed their "strong opposition to these austerity measures that are plunging Europe into economic stagnation and recession" and "threaten the European social model."
Spanish unions disagreed with the government and employers over the impact of the strike Wednesday morning. While Mr. Toxo and other union leaders called the strike a success, Juan Rosell, the chairman of the main employers’ organization said that the walkouts appeared to be “not very important” and most likely less disruptive of the last general strike in March, based on electricity data and other early indicators. Red Eléctrica, operator of the national electricity grid, said that consumption was down 18.6 percent at 8 a.m. compared to a normal working day.
Nonetheless, Mr. Rosell called the decision to strike “a torpedo against recovery.”
Indeed, it comes as Mr. Rajoy is struggling to convince investors that Madrid will not require further European rescue funding and will meet budget deficit targets agreed with its European counterparts, in spite of a deepening recession.
In Valencia, a group of strikers tried to block access to the main office of Bankia, a giant lender that the government was forced to nationalize last May because of bad loans, triggering a crisis that forced Madrid to request more than $100 billion in European bailout funds a month later. More recently, banks provoked a public outcry over the evictions of families unable to meet mortgage payments.
Elisabetta Povoledo contributed reporting from Rome, Nicola Clark from Paris, and Niki Kitsantonis from Athens.
that the government was forced to nationalize last May because of bad loans, triggering a crisis that forced Madrid to request more than $100 billion in European bailout funds a month later. More recently, banks provoked a public outcry over the evictions of families unable to meet mortgage payments.
Elisabetta Povoledo contributed reporting from Rome, Nicola Clark from Paris, and Niki Kitsantonis from Athens.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Phone Monopolies Sell Your Info


How Telecoms Sell Your Private Info to the Highest Bidder

By David Rosen, AlterNet
12 November 12
 ave you ever lost your mobile phone and been able to find it through your wireless company's GPS tracking service? Or have you signed up for a family locator program to check on where your kids are through their phones? If so, you've voluntarily entered the world of telco tracking. Unfortunately, these are but the most innocent tracking programs that wireless companies like AT&T and Verizon are engaged in.
Every seven seconds or so, one's wireless company tracks your position vis-à-vis the nearest cell tower, determining not only your location but how long your call lasts. What a phone company does with this data, let alone with all the other information it gathers, remains the company's secret.
Earlier this year, Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) revealed that, in 2011, state and local law enforcement agencies had received approximately 1.3 million records from the nation's wireless carriers. A wireless customer's personal information provided to law enforcement entities is fairly comprehensive. It includes geo-locational or GPS data, 911 call responses, text message content, billing records, wiretaps, "ping" location and what are known as cell tower "dumps" (i.e., a carrier provides all the phones numbers of cell users that connect with a discrete tower during a discrete period of time).
Equally insidious, these same wireless providers are aggressively collecting and reselling your usage data. The most widely used method is through a special GPS geo-location program offered by Carrier IQ known as CIQ.
Are You Being Tracked?
On October 10, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) sent inquires to nine of the nation's leading data brokers asking about their business practices. These companies aggregate and sell consumer information and include Acxiom, Datalogix, Epsilon, Experian, Rapleaf and Spokeo.
The senator should ask the same questions to the nation's leading wireless providers.
"Data is the new oil," declared Bill Diggins, a Verizon Wireless exec in charge of the telco's latest data aggregation program, Precision Marketing Insights (PMI). Verizon, along with Sprint, introduced its initial device tracking service in 2007.
But PMI goes further. According to Diggins: "We're able to analyze what people are viewing on their handsets." He offered the following example: "If you're at an MLB game, we can tell if you're viewing ESPN, we can tell if you're viewing MLB, we can tell what social networking sites you're activating, if you're sending out mobile usage content that's user-generated on video."
Other wireless executives share Diggins' enthusiasm for data collection. Sprint company spokesperson Stephanie Vinge Walsh champions the power of the telecos: "We think it's a benefit to receive ads targeting your interests rather than ads which may not be relevant."
Verizon's PMI program allows it to collect user data from devices running on either an Android or an Apple OS (operating system). According to Verizon, the data collected includes what products and services a consumer is using (e.g., device type, calling features and usage patterns), what apps are on the device and GPS location. In addition, it collects a host of demographic and psychographic information "such as gender, age range, sports fan, frequent diner, or pet owner."
Further, the company acknowledges that all the collected information can be combined into "aggregated and marketing reports." In turn, these reports can be sold to third-party entities like data aggregators and direct marketing firms. However, it insists: "We may combine this information in a manner that does not personally identify you." Some reports indicated that Verizon provides a customer's home address to third parties.
Diggins identified the company's long-term goal as insinuating itself into a customer's mobile wallet. "So we're able to identify what that customer likes not by filling out forms but by actually analyzing what they do on a day to day basis and serve them with products we know they like because we've seen they've downloaded and purchased products like that."
Pulling the curtain further aside, Diggins reveals the underlying rationale of Verizon's data collection effort: "We're doing this on a one-to-one basis even though we're marketing on an aggregate anonymous because we're able to just view everything they [users] do."
Not to be undone, AT&T actively collects user data. It introduced its FamilyMap program to track the location of any cell phone on AT&T's network in 2009. On its AdWorks site, AT&T promotes its capabilities to "reach customized audience segments based on anonymous and aggregate demographics."
AT&T insists it doesn't sell personal data to third parties. Rather, it offers "[third parties] products and services, packages, discounts and promotions from the AT&T companies, such as High Speed DSL Internet access, wireless service and U-verse TV services, which may be different from the types of services you already purchase."
AT&T provides "location information" to Sense Networks, a company analyzing mobile location data for advertising. One of its products, CitySense, highlights local nightspots to customers based on cellphone usage.
"Because cell phones have become so ubiquitous," notes Ramón Cáceres, a researcher at AT&T's labs in Florham Park, NJ, "mining the data they generate can really revolutionize the study of human behavior."
He described how, last year, AT&T undertook a study of the travel habits of wireless subscribers in the New York and Los Angeles regions. The company sifted through millions of call detail records (CDRs) from hundreds of thousands of customers in 891 separate zip codes areas. It analyzed the origin and destination numbers, the type and duration of call and the location of the cell tower nearest to where the call was made.
A full report of AT&T's research findings was not released. However, what was disclosed is illuminating as to how data collectors analyze customer behavior. It found that, on average, people living in Manhattan travel 2.5 miles most days, compared to five miles in Los Angeles. "But," according to Cáceres, "we also found that when you look at the longest trips people make, people that live in New York go significantly further, 69 miles on a weekday compared to 29 in Los Angeles."
The other two leading wireless providers, Sprint and T-Mobile, are also commercializing subscriber data. A T-Mobile spokesperson said it "collects information about the Web sites that customers visit and their location" and that it "may use that information in an anonymous, aggregate form to improve our services." T-Mobile employs the Carrier IQ program for GPS tracking. It does not provide information as to the third-party customers it provides user data.
Sprint provides customer data to third parties. Going further than either AT&T or Verizon, it lets advertisers target customized messages to a subscriber's wireless phone. However, it insists that it does not provide third parties with customer's site visit information or location data; it ended its relation with Carrier IQ last year.
One of the most intriguing areas in which wireless companies are working with third parties involves auto insurance. This may explain why AT&T conducted such extensive research into subscribers' mobility habits. Sprint recently established the Integrated Insurance Solutions unit offering "usage-based insurance" data.
Sprint is working with Allstate's unit, Esurance, on a pilot program in Arizona and Texas. It offers insurance companies a turnkey tracking solution, including the on-board car tracking device, the wireless connectivity to capture, send and record the data, and the program to evaluate the driver's performance.
One of the major providers of such insurance is Progressive through its "Snapshot" program. Working with Sprint, it identifies the car's Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), tracks the driver's speed, time of day, location and braking patterns via a diagnostic device plugged into the car. Perhaps more insidious, it also records when the device is connected and disconnected from the vehicle. Snapshot does not include GPS tracking technology, nor identify the vehicle's location, nor whether the driver broke the speed limit.
According to a recent article in Reuters, "more than 30 North American insurers are looking at some sort of usage-based program."
Tracking and personal privacy are growing concerns among Americans, yet a very grey area in the courts, Congress and the Obama administration. A recent study by UC Berkeley School of Law found Americans overwhelmingly believe data stored on their mobile phones is private. Nearly three out of five (59%) of respondents 18 to 65-plus said their phones were "at least as private" as their home computers and 19 percent believed their phones were more private than their home computers.
The U.S. federal courts seem confused over cyber privacy. In January, the Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v. Jones that the police could not hide a tracking device in a suspect's car without a valid warrant. More recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Cincinnati, OH) ruled the conviction of an alleged drug dealer should stand because there is no constitutional right to cellphone privacy; a custom "did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone."
The Obama Justice Department has repeatedly come out in opposition to a customer's privacy rights using a wireless services. As it noted in a case in February, "... a customer has no privacy interest in cell-site records, which are business records created and stored by a cell phone provider in its ordinary course of business." It insists that Fourth Amendment prohibitions against "unreasonable" searches and seizures do not apply to a mobile device.
Both the progressive Electronic Frontier Foundation and the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute have raised concerns about telco tracking. Both insist that the aggregation and sale of customer data by wireless companies might violate federal electronic privacy laws. Three statutes are sited: the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA), the Communications Act of 1934 and the Cable TV Privacy Act of 1984. In particular, the cable law requires "prior written or electronic consent of the subscriber" before any personally identifiable information can be collected.
When Congress settles down in the wake of the 2012 election, the efforts of Sen. Rockefeller, Rep. Markey and others will likely focus a spotlight on cyber privacy like never before.
In the meantime, what can a wireless user do? Each of the major wireless providers offers customers various means to limit tracking. Be advised that "opt out" procedures are not easy to find and challenging to implement. The following are good sites to start:
For more information on opt-out options and privacy rights regarding wireless devices, check out these resources.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Labor Proposes Progressive Issues


Labor seeks more liberal, pro-union agenda after helping Obama win battleground states

By Associated Press, Published: November 10

WASHINGTON — After two years of getting pummeled in Wisconsin, Indiana and other battleground states, leaders of the nation’s big labor unions were beaming on election night.
Labor’s massive voter turnout effort played a major role in helping President Barack Obama win Ohio, Nevada and Wisconsin, according to exit polls, and its leaders are now looking for a more liberal, pro-union agenda from the White House.
“There are things the president can do, and we’ll be expecting that leadership from President Obama,” AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka told reporters after the election.
Topping labor’s wish list — for now — is a push to raise taxes on wealthy Americans and discouraging Obama from agreeing to any deal with Republicans over the looming “fiscal cliff” that cuts into Social Security and Medicare.
But unions are also pressing for new measures that might help boost their sagging membership rolls. New investment in infrastructure would bring construction jobs for trade unions. Immigration reform — and a path to citizenship for 11 million undocumented Latino immigrants — would create a vast new pool of potential union members. And new regulations could remove some obstacles to union organizing.
Business groups that have vigorously opposed efforts to help unions draw new members say they will keep playing defense.
“My primary concern is in the regulations,” said Randel Johnson, vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for labor issues. “We are afraid that on employment issues, the administration will stay firmly to the left and follow the lead of the unions.”
A new rule expected from the Labor Department would force companies to reveal relationships with so-called union-busting consulting companies even if the companies have no contact with workers. The National Labor Relations Board is expected to start work on a rule that would force businesses to turn over workers’ phone numbers, emails and shift times to union organizers.
The Obama administration might even consider a plan that would give an advantage in bidding on government contracts to companies that offer workers a higher living wage and generous benefits.
Unlike four years ago, unions have not made passage of card-check legislation a centerpiece of their agenda. The long-stalled measure that would require companies to recognize a union once more than half its eligible employees signed union cards instead of putting the question to a secret-ballot vote went nowhere in Obama’ first term, to the chagrin of many union activists.
Card check remains a dead end with Republicans in firm control of the House. Amy Dean, a former head of the AFL-CIO in California’s Silicon Valley, said unions are being more realistic about what they can get.
“They are all about strengthening the right to organize within the confines of what’s politically possible,” Dean said.
Unions showed they still wield considerable political muscle, despite declining membership and having to spend millions fighting efforts in dozens of state legislatures to curb their bargaining rights or limit their political clout. About 11.8 percent of all workers belong to a union; in the private sector union membership is only 6.9 percent.
Exit polls show Obama won 58 percent of voters from union households, compared with 40 percent for Republican Mitt Romney. That margin rose to 60 percent in Ohio and 66 percent in Wisconsin, where 1 of every 5 voters comes from a union household.
“We did deliver those states,” Trumka said. “Without organized labor, none of those would have been in the president’s column.”
Unions expected to spend big — more than $400 million — to help Obama and other union-friendly candidates at the federal, state and local levels. The country’s largest public workers union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, says it spent about $100 million while the Service Employees International Union says it spent $85 million.
But labor’s election success hinged in large part on its extensive ground game. Thousands of volunteers made millions of personal contacts with union and nonunion voters. Labor also took advantage of new rules on super-PACs, funneling at least $77 million to the groups, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
An analysis by the Sunlight Foundation, which tracks money in politics, found that unions and other Democratic-leaning groups were far more successful than outside conservative groups in targeting money toward winning House and Senate campaigns. The SEIU spent more than 70 percent of its funds on winners, for example, while Karl Rove’s American Crossroads and its nonprofit affiliate had only a 6 percent success rate.
In addition to measures that may help increase union numbers, labor leaders are also expecting the Obama administration to issue more regulations targeting workplace safety. Proposed rules to protect workers from cancer-causing and lung-damaging silica, often found in the dust at construction sites and glass manufacturing operations, have languished at the White House for more than a year. The administration also has delayed new standards for combustible dust that can cause explosions.
Business groups have opposed the regulations, saying they overreach and would raise employers’ costs by millions of dollars.
___
AP Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.
___
Follow Sam Hananel’s labor coverage at http://twitter.com/SamHananelAP

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Labor Campaign for Obama Was Smart


Labor Unions Claim Credit for Obama’s Victory

By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

The nation’s labor unions have not been shy about claiming substantial credit for President Obama’s re-election.
In a news conference Wednesday, Richard Trumka, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.’s president, said that without the huge push by the nation’s labor unions, Mr. Obama never would have won Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada — and their combined 34 electoral votes.
“We did deliver those states,” Mr. Trumka said. “Without organized labor, none of those states would have been in the president’s column.”
A.F.L.-C.I.O. officials said that during the last four days of the campaign, union members and their community partners contacted 800,000 voters in Ohio alone, as part of what they said were 10.7 million door knocks and phone calls made nationwide by the federation’s 56 unions. Moreover, the Service Employees International Union said that its members alone knocked on 5 million doors, including 3.7 million in battleground states.
“We had 100,000 volunteers across the country in the final days,” said Mary Kay Henry, the S.E.I.U. president.
Sixty percent of voters from union households in Ohio voted for Mr. Obama, higher than the 50 percent that Mr. Obama received over all from Ohio voters, according to exit polls that had not been completed. Union households accounted for 22 percent of Ohio’s voters. In Wisconsin, voters from union households made up 21 percent of the electorate, and they voted for Mr. Obama over Mr. Romney, 66 percent to 33 percent.
Fifty-eight percent of voters from union households nationwide backed Mr. Obama and 40 percent supported Mr. Romney, according to the exit polls.
Michael Podhorzer, the labor federation’s political director, said organized labor’s newfound ability – made possible by the Citizens United decision — to knock on the doors of not just union members, but also those of nonunion workers, went far to explain why a significantly higher percentage of white working-class voters in the battleground states where labor was most active voted for Mr. Obama than white working-class voters in non-battleground states.
Some political experts say, however, that white working-class voters in the battleground states leaned toward Mr. Obama out of gratitude for the auto industry bailout and because of the many Obama campaign advertisements attacking Mitt Romney for Bain Capital’s closing plants and outsourcing jobs.
Lee Saunders, chairman of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.’s political committee and president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, said, this was the “the smartest, biggest and broadest effort we’ve ever run” in a political campaign.
Union leaders also hailed the victories of some of labor’s best friends on Capitol Hill, including Sherrod Brown, a Democratic Senator from Ohio.
In his news conference, Mr. Trumka stopped short of saying he expected any quid pro quo from Mr. Obama. But he made clear what organized labor hoped for, especially as the White House prepares to negotiate with Republicans on Capitol Hill on how to reduce the budget deficit.
“People don’t want cuts in MedicareMedicaid and Social Security,” Mr. Trumka said. “Even people who voted for Mitt Romney don’t want that.”
He made clear that to help cut the deficit, Mr. Obama should push forward with his plan to raise taxes on the highest-earning 2 percent of Americans.
The nation’s labor unions are planning rallies in roughly 100 cities on Thursday to protest against cuts in Medicare, Social Security or other social insurance programs.
Mr. Trumka said he also wanted Mr. Obama to push more aggressively to create jobs – for instance, to invest more in rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure and to push Congress to pass the stalled American Jobs Act.
Ms. Henry of the service employees union and Mr. Trumka also made clear that they were eager for the president to push forward on immigration reform, saying that their organizations would strongly back him in such an effort. They join with many Hispanic groups in calling for a path to legalization for millions of unauthorized immigrants.
On Wednesday, labor leaders were celebrating a major victory in California: the defeat of Proposition 32, a ballot initiative backed by several wealthy conservatives, that would have gone far to cripple labor’s political efforts by largely banning unions from using their dues money for politics. That initiative was voted down by 56 percent to 44 percent.
Several conservatives had said that if they won that battle in California, they would push for similar ballot initiatives in other states.
But organized labor suffered a major loss in Michigan on Tuesday. There theUnited Auto Workers and several public employees unions had vigorously backed a ballot initiative that would have enshrined collective bargaining in the state constitution. Such a move would have prohibited the state’s Republican-dominated legislature from enacting a “right to work” law or passing legislation that, like the law in Wisconsin, curbed the ability of government workers to bargain collectively. Business leaders warned that this pro-labor measure would injure the state’s business climate and push up costs for cities and school districts.
Labor and business interests each spent more than $20 million in the fight, and the proposal was defeated 58 percent to 42 percent.
Several union leaders said that if they had won that battle in Michigan, they would have pushed for similar labor-friendly initiatives in other states.

Ed.  Let's offer one in Calfornia

Monopolies Destroy Our Economy


Monopoly Endgame for the Global Economy

Thursday, 08 November 2012 14:29By Thom Hartmann and Sam SacksThe Daily Take | Op-Ed
Let’s face it, if your opponent in Monopoly scoops up Boardwalk, Park Place, North Carolina Avenue, Pacific Avenue, both utilities, and the four railroads – that’s game over.
The other players, all of whom have been relegated to mere consumers instead of property owners, will slowly go bankrupt having to pay higher and higher costs for rent and services, utilities, and transportation. Eventually, one player has all the money and the losers have to clean up the board game and put it away.
But let’s assume the Monopoly game doesn’t end there. Let’s assume the broke players keep rolling the dice and keep going around the board. They essentially keep living their lives desperate and broke, using their credit cards and home lines of credit to stay in the game. Maybe they end up in jail. If they’re lucky, they land on Baltic Avenue and can afford to stay a night in the slums.
Meanwhile, the oligarch who owns everything can no longer collect any income. The other players can’t afford to pay rent, they can’t pay utilities, and they can’t ride on the railroads. Eventually, without consumers spending money, the Monopoly oligarch goes broke, too. His properties and businesses disappear and suddenly everyone is broke!
That’s what Monopoly’s version of economic collapse looks like. And it’s very similar to what global economic collapse in the real world looks like, too.
Now put the Monopoly game board away and consider this: Researchers in Zurich, Switzerland have found that there are roughly 43,000 transnational corporations that dominate the global economy. Of those, there are about 1,300 companies that control 80% of all the global revenues for all the transnational corporations on the planet. Now let’s take it a step further. Of those 1,300 core companies, only 147 companies, which all happen to own each other in some way, control 40% - or nearly half – of all the wealth in the entire transnational corporate network. That means 1% of transnationals own 40% of all the world’s business wealth.
In other words, the global 1% has its own 1%.   
This is similar to a Monopoly situation in which just one player owns 40% of the board. And just like it’s game over for Monopoly, it’s game over for the global economy, too.  
Right now, you can count the number of banks that own half of all the wealth in the U.S. economy on just one hand. There are just five of them and they are the usual suspects: Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citigroup. Their total assets equal 8.5 trillion, which is 56% of our entire economy.
In 2007 we all learned the consequences of disproportionate wealth and power concentrated in the hands of just a few companies. When one company begins to fail, they all begin to fail. And when they all fail, well, that’s what collapse looks like.
That why policymakers labeled the banks “Too Big to Fail” and bailed them out to prevent total collapse. Today, these banks are even bigger. And thanks to globalization, their tentacles are wrapped around the entire world’s economy. It won’t just be the United States imploding the next time these giants fall: it will be much of planet Earth itself.  
This is the danger of raw, unfettered capitalism. This is where the demands of higher and higher quarterly profits take down the economy. Companies begin devouring each other, sucking whatever wealth they can from each other. This was made easier by deregulation policies in the 1980’s and 1990’s that trigged a mergers and acquisitions mania under Reagan, and free trade policies under Clinton that opened up the game board for these transnational corporation to feast on even more industries abroad.  
Out of this, the few strong survive and have enormous power to fix prices for consumers. The inventors of Monopoly were right about what happens when one person owns all the railroads or all the utilities or all the apartment buildings: prices go up.
And to secure even more profits, these companies begin extracting wealth from their own workers, cutting their salaries and benefits. And like broke Monopoly players, real world consumers can’t afford to pay their mortgages, put gas in their car, or buy groceries. In the game-world, the corporate masters win. But in the real world, they eventually lose like the rest of us.
The corporate masters seem to have forgotten they depend on working people for their own survival. And today things have gotten really bad.
This corporatocracy made up of just over 100 transnational corporations are desperately trying to garner more wealth by toppling governments in Europe and demanding wealth-extracting austerity (or what has been referred to in the United States since the 1980’s as “Starve the Beast”).
This was predicted by Bill Clinton’s former Deputy Secretary of Treasury, Roger Altman, back in 2011. He explained that these corporate forces, “oust entrenched regimes where normal political processes could not do so. They force austerity, banking bail-out and other major policy changes. Their influence dwarfs multilateral institutions such as the International Monetary Fund. Indeed, leaving aside unusable nuclear weapons, they have become the most powerful force on Earth.”
The violence on display in Greece is a consequence of the Monopoly endgame the world economy is in. No matter how much austerity that nations like Greece, Spain, and Europe endure, these corporate masters will be unsatisfied and they’ll demand even more. They’ll take their harvesting machines to Germany, the U.K., and eventually the United States. In fact, they’ve already begun. Until eventually they’ve destroyed the one thing that keeps their own hearts beating: working people.
That’s when collapse happens.
As the researchers in Zurich have discovered with actual data, we’re all living in a functional oligarchy today with just a handful of corporations – all of which are wealthier and more powerful than most sovereign governments – sucking whatever remaining wealth they can from the rest of us.
And just like how the oil industry is willing to suck the last trillion dollars of oil out of the ground  with no plans about what to do when it’s all gone, these corporate masters are willing to suck the last wealth out of the middle class without any plans of what to do when their consumers disappear.
Everyone needs to wake up to this economic reality before we’re all dragged toward collapse. If not, the mess will be a lot bigger to clean up than just a few scattered dice, thimbles, and a chance card.
 
This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license.