Wednesday, August 6, 2014

200 CIA Torturers Immune from Justice

Happy Anniversary, CIA! 12 Years of Lawlessness!

By Chris Anders, Senior Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office at 12:52pm
Wow. Twelve years. The time has flown by. Seems like just yesterday that the Justice Department sent over its torture memos to then-CIA General Counsel John Rizzo, ramping up a CIA torture program that horribly abused more than a hundred men, killing a few of them. No one at the CIA was ever even charged with a crime. Some agents, in fact, got job promotions.
Those initial August 2002 memos were soon followed by a flood of legal opinions designed to prop up a clearly criminal torture program.
Old history? Hardly. The torture memos were just the start of a string of scandals that has resulted in no meaningful reform of or accountability for an agency that seems to be getting a blank check – to this day. The CIA, with the backing or orders of the White House, ran a worldwide network of secret prisons where it tortured men with barbaric techniques (some inspired by the TV show 24); kidnapped people from European streets; and then reportedly lied to Congress, the White House, and the Justice Department about it.
The lawlessness continued, even after horrified Americans found out what was happening. More legal memos were written to try to keep torturing, even after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)  convinced Congress to pass yet another law to stop it. Top CIA officials ordered evidence — videotapes of men being subjected to simulated drowning — destroyed before investigators could view them.
On his second day in office, President Obama ordered the CIA to close its secret prisons, banned the CIA from all but short-term transitory detention, and put the CIA under the same interrogation rules that apply to the military.
But did that stop the lawlessness? Not really. With President Obama promising to "look forwards, not backwards," CIA officials, and all Bush officials, dodged any criminal indictments, were protected from lawsuits by courts that deferred to CIA secrecy and immunity claims, and did whatever they could to get in the way of Senate investigators.
The lawlessness remains because the Constitution's system of checks and balances is broken. The president, Congress, and the courts seem unwilling or unable to hold the CIA accountable.
Incredibly, more than 200 CIA employees who were involved in the torture program are today still employed at the CIA. The acting general counsel of the CIA until this past March was the very same person who had been one of the CIA's top torture lawyers a decade ago. And in something more reminiscent of organized crime than good government, current CIA leadership met this spring with Bush-era CIA leadership to brainstorm how to undermine a Senate Intelligence Committee report on the CIA's use of torture.
The lawlessness seems to be coming to a head this year. The CIA's internal watchdog, its inspector general, just gave a report to the Senate Intelligence Committee that found that the CIA spied on the computers used by the Senate committee to investigate the CIA torture program. CIA officials created a false online identity, tracked the Senate staff's queries, and manipulated the Senate staff's files. The CIA then falsely accused the Senate staff of wrongdoing by filing a criminal referral with the Justice Department that was based on false information.
When the CIA spying was initially discovered last winter, CIA Director John Brennan publicly blasted anyone criticizing the CIA. But the CIA inspector general is now essentially saying that CIA officials spied on Congress and then lied about it.
How can the Constitution's system of checks and balances work if the CIA spies on the computers used by the very staffers carrying out the Senate's constitutional duty of overseeing the executive branch? An uncontrolled – and seemingly uncontrollable – CIA threatens the very foundations of our Constitution.
Twelve years of CIA lawlessness should be enough. It is long past time for Congress and the president to forever ban the CIA from holding anyone in its custody and running a secret prison. But 
President Obama must also stand up to the CIA and 
to John Brennan himself. Congress must make the 
Senate CIA torture report public and start serving 
as an effective check on the CIA.
No more anniversaries for lawlessness.
Learn more about torture and other civil liberty issuesSign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Venezuela Aids Gaza War Victims

Caracas, Aug 06. AVN.- Venezuela sent 16 tons of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip, the Foreign Minister, Elias Jaua. 

During a press conference in Cairo, Egypt, transmitted by Telesur, Jaua explained that the total tonnage six were collected by the Venezuelan people, while the remaining 10 are provided by the Bolivarian Government. 

"To date, it has collected six tons of medical-surgical supplies, nonperishable food and blankets to be sent in the coming days to the Palestinian people," he said. 

On Wednesday Chancellor Jaua came to Egypt to coordinate support offered by the Government of Venezuela to the Palestinian people, submitted by the unleashed aggression in the Gaza Strip with balance, until now, nearly two thousand dead and more than nine thousand injured. 

The purpose of this visit is part of the task entrusted by the President of the Republic, Nicolas Maduro, in announcing the construction of shelter houses Hugo Chavez to welcome children who have suffered the loss of their parents, after the bombing of Israel's army against the Arab country. 

In that sense, Jaua Chancellor said that the Venezuelan government is working according to accelerating progress for the construction of shelter houses, and mentioned that President Maduro has logistical equipment at sites where these houses are arranged.

Palestinian children arrive in Venezuela once agreed international protocols, through the United Nations Fund for Children (UNICEF, for its acronym in English). 

"We hope to meet with the Venezuelan people love to children victims of this senseless war," he said.

Jaua said the idea, at first, is temporarily harboring these Palestinian children orphaned, so "because our hope is that these children can return to a free and independent Palestinian peace."

To that end, he said that next week the Foreign Minister of the State of Palestine, Riad Malki, come to Caracas to make arrangements, all within the provisions of the International Convention on the Rights of Children. 

Malki's visit to Venezuela will be specifically for inspections to be located where the houses are.

October: Meeting delegations of Venezuela and Egypt

In October next, delegations from Venezuela and Egypt will meet in Caracas to further increase bilateral cooperation in areas such as energy, agriculture and tourism, the Chancellor Jaua advancement.

"We have agreed to advance the growth of our bilateral cooperation. To do this, we will wait in Caracas, in the month of October, a government and business delegation to work on issues of energy cooperation, agricultural and tourism exchange. We have offered, on behalf of our President Nicolas Maduro, our sincere friendship to the government of President Abdel Fatah Al Sisi and the people of Egypt, "he said.

The number of people killed by Israel in Gaza exceeds 1,850 and the number of wounded increased to over 9,400.

Since Israel's attacks on Gaza were restarted on July 7 last, hundreds of  homes, schools, shelters and factories have been destroyed.

Israel's position and the constant attacks on Palestine have been condemned by the Non-Aligned Movement, the Group of 77 and China (G77 + China), the United Nations (UN) and the world. 

"If Everything is Terrorism, Then Nothing is Terrorism" FBI

Nearly half of the people on the U.S. government’s widely shared database of terrorist suspects are not connected to any known terrorist group, according to classified government documents obtained by The Intercept.
Of the 680,000 people caught up in the government’s Terrorist Screening Database—a watchlist of “known or suspected terrorists” that is shared with local law enforcement agencies, private contractors, and foreign governments—more than 40 percent are described by the government as having “no recognized terrorist group affiliation.” That category—280,000 people—dwarfs the number of watchlisted people suspected of ties to al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah combined.
The documents, obtained from a source in the intelligence community, also reveal that the Obama Administration has presided over an unprecedented expansion of the terrorist screening system. Since taking office, Obama has boosted the number of people on the no fly list more than ten-fold, to an all-time high of 47,000—surpassing the number of people barred from flying under George W. Bush.
“If everything is terrorism, then nothing is terrorism,” says David Gomez, a former senior FBI special agent. The watchlisting system, he adds, is “revving out of control.”
Shrug Chart - Josh Begley
The classified documents were prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center, the lead agency for tracking individuals with suspected links to international terrorism. Stamped “SECRET” and “NOFORN” (indicating they are not to be shared with foreign governments), they offer the most complete numerical picture of the watchlisting system to date. Among the revelations:
• The second-highest concentration of people designated as “known or suspected terrorists” by the government is in Dearborn, Mich.—a city of 96,000 that has the largest percentage of Arab-American residents in the country.
• The government adds names to its databases, or adds information on existing subjects, at a rate of 900 records each day.
• The CIA uses a previously unknown program, code-named Hydra, to secretly access databases maintained by foreign countries and extract  data to add to the watchlists.
A U.S. counterterrorism official familiar with watchlisting data told The Intercept that as of November 2013, there were approximately 700,000 people in the Terrorist Screening Database, or TSDB, but declined to provide the current numbers. Last month, the Associated Press, citing federal court filings by government lawyers, reported that there have been 1.5 million names added to the watchlist over the past five years. The government official toldThe Intercept that was a misinterpretation of the data. “The list has grown somewhat since that time, but is nowhere near the 1.5 million figure cited in recent news reports,” he said. He added that the statistics cited by the Associated Press do not just include nominations of individuals, but also bits of intelligence or biographical information obtained on watchlisted persons.
When U.S. officials refer to “the watchlist,” they typically mean the TSDB, an unclassified pool of information shared across the intelligence community and the military, as well as local law enforcement, foreign governments, and private contractors. According to the government’s watchlisting guidelines, published by The Intercept last month, officials don’t need “concrete facts” or “irrefutable evidence” to secretly place someone on the list—only a vague and elastic standard of “reasonable suspicion.”
“You need some fact-basis to say a guy is a terrorist, that you know to a probable-cause standard that he is a terrorist,” says Gomez, the former FBI agent. “Then I say, ‘Build as big a file as you can on him.’ But if you just suspect that somebody is a terrorist? Not so much.”
The National Counterterrorism Center did not respond to questions about its terrorist screening system. Instead, in a statement, it praised the watchlisting system as a “critical layer in our counterrorism defenses” and described it as superior to the pre-9/11 process for tracking threats, which relied on lists that were “typed or hand-written in card catalogues and ledgers.” The White House declined to comment.

A milestone

Most people placed on the government’s watchlist begin in a larger, classified system known as the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE). The TIDE database actually allows for targeting people based on far less evidence than the already lax standards used for placing people on the watchlist. A more expansive—and invasive—database, TIDE’s information is shared across the U.S. intelligence community, as well as with commando units from the Special Operations Command and with domestic agencies such as the New York City Police Department.
In the summer of 2013, officials celebrated what one classified document prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center refers to as “a milestone”—boosting the number of people in the TIDE database to a total of one million, up from half a million four years earlier.
The document credits that historic achievement to the Directorate of Terrorist Identities (DTI), a secretive and virtually unknown U.S. counterterrorism unit responsible for maintaining TIDE. “This number is a testament to DTI’s hard work and dedication over the past 2.5 years,” the document declares.
The number is also a testament to the Obama administration’s intensified collection of personal information on individuals with suspected links to terrorism. In 2006, CBS News obtained a copy of the no fly list and reported that it included 44,000 names, including Bolivian President Evo Morales and the head of Lebanon’s parliament. Faced with a widespread public backlash, the government cut the list down to just 4,000 names by late 2009.
The next year, after the so-called “underwear bomber” tried to bring down a commercial airliner bound for Detroit, Obama loosened the criteria for adding people to the no fly list. The impact was immediate. Since 2010, the classified documents note, the National Counterterrorism Center has “created more than 430,000 terrorism-related person records” while deleting only 50,000 people “whose nexus to terrorism was refuted or did not meet current watchlisting criteria.” The documents reveal that more than 240 TIDE “nominations” are now processed each day.
“You might as well have a blue wand and just pretend there’s magic in it, because that’s what we’re doing with this—pretending that it works,” says former FBI agent Michael German, now a fellow at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. “These agencies see terrorism as a winning card for them. They get more resources. They know that they can wave that card around and the American public will be very afraid and Congress and the courts will allow them to get away with whatever they’re doing under the national security umbrella.”

Watchlisting by the numbers

In the documents, the government emphasizes that it seeks to add only as many people to the TIDE list “as are necessary for our nation’s counterterrorism mission.” With hundreds of new nominations coming in every day, the numbers provide only a momentary snapshot of a watchlist system that is in constant motion.
An August 2013 slide from the National Counterterrorism Center called “TIDE By The Numbers” lays out the scope of the Obama administration’s watchlisting system, and those it is targeting. According to the document, which notes that the numbers are “approximate,” 680,000 people have been watchlisted, with another 320,000 monitored in the larger TIDE database. As of August 2013, 5,000 Americans were on the watchlist while another 15,800 were targeted in TIDE.
Among the other revelations in the documents:
• 16,000 people, including 1,200 Americans, have been classified as “selectees” who are targeted for enhanced screenings at airports and border crossings.
• There are 611,000 men on the main terrorist watchlist and 39,000 women.
• The top “nominating agencies” responsible for placing people on the government’s watchlists are: the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
• The top five U.S. cities represented on the main watchlist for “known or suspected terrorists” are New York; Dearborn, Mich.; Houston; San Diego; and Chicago. At 96,000 residents, Dearborn is much smaller than the other cities in the top five, suggesting that its significant Muslim population—40 percent of its population is of Arab descent, according to the U.S. Census Bureau—has been disproportionately targeted for watchlisting. Residents and civil liberties advocates havefrequently argued the Muslim, Arab and Sikh communities in and around Dearborn are unfairly targeted by invasive law enforcement probes, unlawful profiling, and racism.
“To my knowledge, there have been no Muslims in Dearborn who have committed acts of terrorism against our country,” Dawud Walid, executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told The Intercept. Walid added that the high concentration of Dearborn residents in the watchlisting system “just confirms the type of engagement the government has with our community—as seeing us as perpetual suspects.”
nofly_numbers_v9
The documents also offer a glimpse into which groups the government is targeting in its counterterrorism mission. The groups with the largest number of targeted people on the main terrorism watchlist—aside from “no recognized terrorist group affiliation”—are al Qaeda in Iraq (73,189), the Taliban (62,794), and al Qaeda (50,446). Those are followed by Hamas (21,913) and Hezbollah (21,199).
Although the Obama administration has repeatedly asserted that al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula poses the most significant external terrorist threat to the United States, the 8,211 people identified as being tied to the group actually represent the smallest category on the list of the top ten recognized terrorist organizations. AQAP is outnumbered by people suspected of ties to the Pakistan-based Haqqani Network (12,491), the Colombia-based FARC (11,275,) and the Somalia-based al-Shabab (11,547).
The documents also reveal that as of last year, the U.S. had designated 3,200 people as “known or suspected terrorists” associated with the war in Syria. Among them were 715 Europeans and Canadians, as well as 41 Americans. Matt Olsen, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, recently claimed that there are more than 12,000 foreign fighters in Syria, including more than 1,000 Westerners and roughly 100 Americans.

Biometric data

According to the documents, the government does much more than simply stop watchlisted people at airports. It also covertly collects and analyzes a wide range of personal information about those individuals –including facial images, fingerprints, and iris scans.
In the aftermath of last year’s Boston Marathon bombing, the Directorate of Terrorist Identities began an aggressive program to collect biometric data and other information on all Americans on the TIDE list. “This project includes record by record research of each person in relevant Department of State and [intelligence community] databases, as well as bulk data requests for information,” the documents note.
The DTI also worked on the subsequent Chicago Marathon, performing “deep dives” for biometric and other data on people in the Midwest whose names were on the TIDE list. In the process, the directorate pulled the TIDE records of every person with an Illinois, Indiana, or Wisconsin driver license.
DTI’s efforts in Boston and Chicago are part of a broader push to obtain biometric information on the more than one million people targeted in its secret database. This includes hundreds of thousands of people who are not watchlisted. In 2013, the directorate’s Biometric Analysis Branch (BAB) launched an initiative to obtain biometric data from driver’s license records across the country. At least 15 states and the District of Columbia are working with the directorate to facilitate access to facial images from driver’s licenses. In fiscal year 2013, 2,400 such images were provided for inclusion in the secret TIDE database.
According to the documents, BAB offers its “unique skill of facial identification support” to a “broad customer base.” Last year its analysts produced more than 290 reports for other government entities, including the CIA, the New York City Police Department, and the military’s elite Special Operations Command.
All told, the classified documents show, the government compiles strikingly detailed dossiers of data on individuals who have been swept up in its databases. Though some of the documents obtained by The Interceptoffer conflicting information on how much biometric data the government collects,the most detailed report shows that:
• In 2013, the main terrorism database included more than 860,000 biometric files on 144,000 people.
• The database contains more than a half a million facial images, nearly a quarter of a million fingerprints and 70,000 iris scans.
• The government maintains biometric data on people that it hasn’t identified–TIDE contains 1,800 “BUPs,” or “biometrics of unknown persons.”
• In a single year, the government expanded its collection of “non-traditional” biometric data, including dramatic increases in handwriting samples (32 percent), signatures (52 percent), scars, marks, and tattoos (70 percent), and DNA strands (90 percent).
“We’re getting into Minority Report territory when being friends with the wrong person can mean the government puts you in a database and adds DMV photos, iris scans, and face recognition technology to track you secretly and without your knowledge,” says Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project. “The fact that this information can be shared with agencies from the CIA to the NYPD, which are not known for protecting civil liberties, brings us closer to an invasive and rights-violating government surveillance society at home and abroad.”
The DTI also goes far beyond accessing information from state driver’s licenses. In managing the main terrorism database, the directorate coordinates with the CIA and the National Media Exploitation Center, a Pentagon wing responsible for analyzing and disseminating “paper documents, electronic media, videotapes, audiotapes, and electronic equipment” seized abroad in military or intelligence operations.
By sharing information with the military, the National Counterterrorism Center asserts, the DTI is able to “obtain additional data fusion points by accessing and exploiting NMEC data holdings.” In return, the directorate “provides NMEC with a classified biometric search capability against TIDE through automated and manual facial identification support.”
The DTI also harvests information from CIA sources, including a secret database called CINEMA— short for CIA Information Needs Management—and a secret CIA program called “Hydra,” which utilizes “clandestinely acquired foreign government information” to enhance the quality of  life.

CA Assembly Visit Central America

California lawmakers conclude 

July 14-23, fact-finding mission

Vida en el Valle

SACRAMENTO — Central American leaders are not oblivious to the tide of young children and their mothers who paid up to $10,000 to risk a perilous, two-week journey in an effort to avoid gang beatings and killings in their home countries.
While most in Congress have joined President Obama in finding out how to quickly deport the estimated 57,000 minors from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, six California lawmakers (all Democrats— visited those Central American countries to see what the state can do to meet the humanitarian challenge.
"It was a very eye-opening experience," said Assemblymember Luis Alejo, D-Watsonville.
Alejo — who was joined by state Sens. Darrell Steinberg of Sacramento, Ellen Corbett of the East Bay; and, Assemblymembers V. Manuel Pérez of Coachella, Henry T. Perea of Fresno, and, José Medina of Riverside — confirmed the migration was due to crime and safety, and not for education or work.
"It was certainly true that many cities in El Salvador — 19 to be exact — are facing serious gang problems and a lot of violence, but that is not true for most of the country," said Alejo.
"However, the majority of minors who are leaving those 19 cities are also the ones leaving the country," he said.
Sexual violence and human trafficking, gangs and other types of violence are the reason so many children are leaving El Salvador.
"Those who stay in these communities face one of two things: either join the gangs or become a victim of sexual abuse or sexual assault," said Alejo.
The July 14-23 fact-finding mission has been in the works before the refugee crisis erupted last month.
"We were interested in meeting with the leaders of those countries and discussing economic development, water, energy, and trade and of course, immigration," said Pérez. "However, it was immigration that became front and center."
El Salvador looking for solutions
The delegation's first stop was El Salvador, where the group spoke to President Salvador Sánchez Cerén. The leader who said his country was aware of the migration, and pointed to the efforts being made to address issues like violence and poverty.
The Salvadoran government has been and is addressing efforts to minimize the violence and making "great strides" in helping their country meet the needs of its citizens, said Alejo.
"In the last five years, El Salvador created a first breakfast program in schools for children, has implemented the use of school uniforms, has created a system to grant small grants and loans to farmers with the hope of reinvigorating efforts to export corn, beans and rice; and they have implemented after-school programs to keep children out of violence," said Alejo.
Cerén, said Alejo, recognizes there is more work to be done. The government has hired more police officers and has implemented new training procedures to minimize violence. Officials are working with the U.S. to solve the gang problems. Legislation has been passed to prevent political corruption.
"They have started to build medical clinics in rural areas so that those who are under-served have more access and opportunities. They want to expand public education which is really important," said Pérez. "Overall, the leadership in El Salvador is making great progress in making their country a better place."
El Salvador wants the voiceless to have a voice.
"The country wants a better, more peaceful future and they are taking all the steps necessary to ensure they can carry out their goals for the country. However, they do need the support of the United States," said Alejo.
The situation in Guatemala is in sharp contrast, said the lawmakers.
"There is political corruption at the highest of levels," said Pérez. "About 25 families control the economy of the country and there is no left-leaning political party for people to vote for.
"Not a single party exists that represents the voice of the people, the vulnerable or the indigenous."
Additionally, Guatemala has no tax system. Most of the countries elite, who own the majority of the land, pay no property taxes. There are also high levels of poverty in the highlands region of Guatemala, where a majority of indigenous groups, like the Mayas, continue to live.
"Most of the people, who are leaving Guatemala, are the indigenous from these communities, especially the young children because they do not have access to an education and there is extreme poverty," said Alejo. "They come to America because there is hope that they can at least get an education and have something to eat."
Honduras worse off
Honduras has a more difficult situation, according to the lawmakers.
"It faces the toughest situation. It's somewhat of a nation-state where there are a lot of criminal gangs, a lack of opportunities and a lot of violence against women," said Pérez.
"Both the governments of El Salvador and Guatemala recognize that Honduras is in a much more challenging position to move forward," he said.
The migration problem, said Pérez, can be solved if the U.S. can get comprehensive immigration reform.
"The No. 1 reason why so many children are coming to our borders is because of family reunification," said Pérez. "Many of the children who find themselves in a position where they are old enough to travel, have had family members who left them a few years ago to make a life for themselves in the United States and now that they have saved enough money, they are hiring coyotes and other smugglers to bring their children across."
Coyotes and other smugglers charge exorbitant fees — between $5,000 and $10,000 — with the promise of getting their children into the U.S. Abuse by police and even death can await the children, but families are often desperate to reunite with their children.
Of the Central American children who have arrived at the U.S. border, few have been deported back to their country of origin. Those who have, do so out of choice.
"Most of them have no relatives in the United States or are weary of leaving their children in the hands of the U.S. government so they return with their children," said Alejo.
"But what is waiting for them when they get back? Absolutely nothing. There are no social services in Guatemala, no job opportunities, nothing. They go back to the same conditions and the reason why they first fled in the first place."
Immigration reform needed
Migration to the United States will continue said both state lawmakers, so long as the United States does not take a proactive approach in both recognizing that the reason for so many of the troubles that plague Central American countries has been a direct result of American intervention during the early 1980s and 1990s that left the countries in long and bloody civil wars.
"We have a responsibility, in my opinion, to do what we can to build up the economies of these countries by supporting them with resources as we did in the past when we intervened instead of supporting progressive, leftist parties," said Pérez.
"We have to understand that the reason we are facing the humanitarian crisis and the reason why these countries continue to struggle has been a direct result of our interventions and when we acknowledge and accept that, then can we take a more proactive approach in helping these countries achieve economic, political and social stability," said Pérez.
"They want to change, they want to provide better opportunities for their people, but they need our help."
For those reasons, will migration come to a standstill. Otherwise, "those who are deported will continue to find a way back to the United States," said Alejo.
However, Central American countries are trying to keep people from migrating because of the dangers.
"They are beginning a public campaign to discourage people from making the trip to the U.S. and are presenting public service announcements highlighting the dangers. The El Salvadorian government understands the key to stopping the migration is to provide better educational opportunities, jobs for their people, and security," said Assembly member Henry T. Perez, D-Fresno.
Why? Because the United States-in the eyes of so many Central American's-continues to be "the land of opportunity and fulfilling the American Dream," said Perez.
Addressing the humanitarian crisis
The delegation wants to find solutions. When the Legislature convenes this month, lawmakers plan to introduce bills that will help the Central American countries.
"We have a few pieces of legislation brewing, but first and foremost we have to ensure fair treatment of the children who are already here; that they are treated with dignity and respect and are allowed due process and access to a lawyer and the courts," said Pérez.
A few days ago, Steinberg, the state Senate leader, announced his office would provide pro bono legal representation to undocumented and unaccompanied children arriving in California from Central América.
His policy director Anthony Williams and senior policy consultant Margie Estrada will participate in the Los Ángeles County Bar Association's Legal Assistance Project in conjunction with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) Southern California Chapter.
"These children face a daunting immigration process in a foreign legal system without any legal representation. A kid is a kid, and should be shown compassion regardless of where they were born," said Steinberg in a statement.
Send e-mail to:
cmoreno@vidaenelvalle.com